Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.95.3 in qmail

2009-12-09 Thread P.V.Anthony
Murugan wrote: I need small clarification in clamav integration with qmail. Please tell me, what variables & variables parameter needs to be configured in qmail service directory for clamav. I use simscan from, http://www.inter7.com/index.php?page=simscan P.V.Anthony ___

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.95.3 in qmail

2009-12-07 Thread fchan
Hi, I use qmail scanner with the st patch that allows to configure quarantine and delete spam messages at specified settings with my qmail installation. Qmail scanner supports clamav and other anti-virus scanners: qmail scanner: http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/ qmail scanner st patch: ht

[Clamav-users] clamav 0.95.3 in qmail

2009-12-05 Thread Murugan
HI Guys, I need small clarification in clamav integration with qmail. Please tell me, what variables & variables parameter needs to be configured in qmail service directory for clamav. Thanks & Regards, P. Murugan Get your world in your inbox! Mail, widgets, documents, spreadsheets, orga

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.95.3 doesn't make on Fedora Core 10

2009-10-30 Thread George R . Kasica
>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:45:08 -0500, you wrote: >>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:00:57 -0500, you wrote: > >>./configure runs fine but fails make here: >> >>/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. >>-I.. -I.. -I./nsis -I./lzma -I../libltdl -DWARN_DLOPEN_FAIL >>-DSEARCH_LIBDI

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.95.3 doesn't make on Fedora Core 10

2009-10-30 Thread George R . Kasica
>On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:00:57 -0500, you wrote: >./configure runs fine but fails make here: > >/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. >-I.. -I.. -I./nsis -I./lzma -I../libltdl -DWARN_DLOPEN_FAIL >-DSEARCH_LIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -MT >li

[Clamav-users] clamav 0.95.3 doesn't make on Fedora Core 10

2009-10-30 Thread George R . Kasica
./configure runs fine but fails make here: /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I./nsis -I./lzma -I../libltdl -DWARN_DLOPEN_FAIL -DSEARCH_LIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -MT libclamav_la-matcher-ac.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libclamav_la

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.95.3 error at make state

2009-10-29 Thread ro
On 2009-10-29 15:23, nikos wrote: > Hello list > I'm trying to install new version of clam on a fedora8 mail server and > when i run make I take the following errors: > > In file included from matcher.h:28, > from others.h:21, > from matcher-bm.c:29: > others.h: In

[Clamav-users] clamav-0.95.3 error at make state

2009-10-29 Thread nikos
Hello list I'm trying to install new version of clam on a fedora8 mail server and when i run make I take the following errors: In file included from matcher.h:28, from others.h:21, from matcher-bm.c:29: others.h: In function βcli_getpagesizeβ: others.h:363: error:

[Clamav-users] clamav-0.95.3 on FreeBSD

2009-10-29 Thread Jerry
I spoke too soon this morning. The FreeBSD clamav port maintainer just informed me that he has patches for the new version and is testing them now. Hopefully, it will be in the ports system shortly. -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com |=== |=== |=== |=== | Let thy maid ser

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.95.3 fails to compile in Fedora 10

2009-10-29 Thread Bill Maidment
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:55:15 - (GMT), Steve Basford wrote > > Hi > > > > same Error on FreeBSD 4.10 > > This fix was added yesterday, so that might be the issue: > > http://git.clamav.net/gitweb?p=clamav-devel.git;a=commitdiff;h=e889924a70e881e0d74ade2b53b5255b94523161 > > ie: > > unistd.h

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.95.3 fails to compile in Fedora 10

2009-10-29 Thread Steve Basford
> Hi > > same Error on FreeBSD 4.10 This fix was added yesterday, so that might be the issue: http://git.clamav.net/gitweb?p=clamav-devel.git;a=commitdiff;h=e889924a70e881e0d74ade2b53b5255b94523161 ie: unistd.h - standard symbolic constants and types: (int getpagesize(void); (LEGACY))

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.95.3 fails to compile in Fe dora 10

2009-10-29 Thread Matthias Haeker
s function) others.h:363: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once others.h:363: for each function it appears in.) - Original Message - From: b...@maidment.vu To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Sent: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:04:18 Subject: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.95.3 fails to compile in Fed

[Clamav-users] clamav-0.95.3 fails to compile in Fedora 10

2009-10-29 Thread Bill Maidment
Hi The new 0.95.3 fails to compile in Fedora 10, but does compile OK in Fedora 11. The Git snapshot does compile in Fedora 10, so obviously it has been fixed there. Will a 0.95.3.1 release be imminent? Cheers Bill This is on a 64 bit machine. Compile error details: libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_

[Clamav-users] clamav-0.95.3 fails to compile in Fedora 10

2009-10-29 Thread Bill Maidment
Hi The new 0.95.3 fails to compile in Fedora 10, but does compile OK in Fedora 11. The Git snapshot does compile in Fedora 10, so obviously it has been fixed there. Will a 0.95.3.1 release be imminent? Cheers Bill -- Bill Maidment Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd www.maidment.vu Consultant to Elgas L

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.95.3

2009-10-01 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Thu Oct 01 2009 08:44:09 GMT+0200 (CEST) Thiyaga wrote: > Hi, > > When can we expect the stable 0.95.3 version to be released? We don't have the date for 0.95.3 yet but will post here and on www.clamav.net when it's established. Thanks, -- oo. Tomasz Kojm (\/)\...

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.95.3

2009-09-30 Thread Dennis Peterson
Thiyaga wrote: Hi, When can we expect the stable 0.95.3 version to be released? Currently we are using 0.95.1 version. If 0.95.3 is going to released soon, we will directly upgrade ClamAV to 0.95.3 instead of upgrading it to 0.95.2 and then to 0.95.3. (But we will not have much choice, if 0.95.

[Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.95.3

2009-09-30 Thread Thiyaga
Hi, When can we expect the stable 0.95.3 version to be released? Currently we are using 0.95.1 version. If 0.95.3 is going to released soon, we will directly upgrade ClamAV to 0.95.3 instead of upgrading it to 0.95.2 and then to 0.95.3. (But we will not have much choice, if 0.95.3 will NOT be rel