Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.92.1 anomaly

2008-02-12 Thread Dennis Peterson
Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, shuttlebox wrote: > >> Maybe you could also try the packages from Blastwave? >> >> http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/clamav > > Wow, this is a switch -- don't we usually tell people they are better of > compiling from source ? :-) > > Se

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.92.1 anomaly

2008-02-12 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, shuttlebox wrote: > I thought so since I had tried scanning with it and it worked but when > I try to get the version info mine also segfaults. :-( Interesting -- yes, it does actually scan, just --version causes the segfault. ==

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.92.1 anomaly

2008-02-12 Thread shuttlebox
On Feb 12, 2008 3:14 PM, Christopher X. Candreva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, shuttlebox wrote: > > > Maybe you could also try the packages from Blastwave? > > > > http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/clamav > > Wow, this is a switch -- don't we usually tell people they are be

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.92.1 anomaly

2008-02-12 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, shuttlebox wrote: > Maybe you could also try the packages from Blastwave? > > http://www.blastwave.org/packages.php/clamav Wow, this is a switch -- don't we usually tell people they are better of compiling from source ? :-) Seriously, do you have a reason to think this par

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.92.1 anomaly

2008-02-12 Thread Randal, Phil
I wrote earlier that > clamscan --version behaves differently in 0.92.1 to 0.92 > > # clamscan --version > ClamAV 0.92.1 > > # clamscan --version > ClamAV 0.92/5785/Tue Feb 12 10:41:10 2008 It looks like the checkin to fix bug 699 (https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=699) has broke

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.92.1 anomaly

2008-02-12 Thread shuttlebox
On Feb 12, 2008 1:43 PM, Christopher X. Candreva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Randal, Phil wrote: > > > clamscan --version behaves differently in 0.92.1 to 0.92 > > > > # clamscan --version > > ClamAV 0.92.1 > > I seem to have a bigger problem: > > [castor]:~/apps/mail/clamav-0

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.92.1 anomaly

2008-02-12 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Randal, Phil wrote: > clamscan --version behaves differently in 0.92.1 to 0.92 > > # clamscan --version > ClamAV 0.92.1 I seem to have a bigger problem: [castor]:~/apps/mail/clamav-0.92.1/clamscan$ ./clamscan --version Segmentation Fault Solaris 8, gcc 4.2.2

[Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.92.1 anomaly

2008-02-12 Thread Randal, Phil
clamscan --version behaves differently in 0.92.1 to 0.92 # clamscan --version ClamAV 0.92.1 # clamscan --version ClamAV 0.92/5785/Tue Feb 12 10:41:10 2008 Can we have the old behaviour back please? Phil -- Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK ___