Re: [Clamav-users] Clam Denial Of Service

2005-06-30 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Mehmet Ekiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050630 12:15]: wrote: > > > Odhiambo Washington yazmış: > >* Scott Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050630 11:34]: wrote: > > > >>gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200506-23 ] Clam AntiVirus: Denial of Service > >>Vulnerability > >> > >>Sorry if this has been discussed befo

Re: [Clamav-users] Clam Denial Of Service

2005-06-30 Thread Mehmet Ekiz
Odhiambo Washington yazmış: * Scott Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050630 11:34]: wrote: gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200506-23 ] Clam AntiVirus: Denial of Service Vulnerability Sorry if this has been discussed before: I do not see anything on the ClamAV website indicating the status of this poten

Re: [Clamav-users] Clam Denial Of Service

2005-06-30 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Scott Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050630 11:34]: wrote: > gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200506-23 ] Clam AntiVirus: Denial of Service > Vulnerability > > Sorry if this has been discussed before: > I do not see anything on the ClamAV website indicating the status of this > potential DoS or whether is

[Clamav-users] Clam Denial Of Service

2005-06-30 Thread Scott Ryan
gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200506-23 ] Clam AntiVirus: Denial of Service Vulnerability Sorry if this has been discussed before: I do not see anything on the ClamAV website indicating the status of this potential DoS or whether is rectified or even no applicable. Can anyone shed some light on this