On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 09:20 +, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
>
> Fair enough, but it's a recent change which is why I wondered if it was
> intentional.
It's not a recent change, we just don't change the build that often.
-trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Trog wrote:
; On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 18:22 +, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
; > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Trog wrote:
; > ;
; > ; Run autoreconf
; >
; > Is this something that has changed and will stay this way ? I don't
; > currently have the auto utilities on my Sun servers and don't r
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 18:22 +, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Trog wrote:
> ;
> ; Run autoreconf
>
> Is this something that has changed and will stay this way ? I don't
> currently have the auto utilities on my Sun servers and don't really want
> to add and have to maintain them.
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Trog wrote:
; On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 13:50 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
; > I am always running on FreeBSD (4.11 and 5.4) if that matters.
; > I am only wondering if anyone has managed to successfully compile
; > Clamav from CVS, or even the snapshot-20050417 at all.
; >
;
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 13:50 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I am always running on FreeBSD (4.11 and 5.4) if that matters.
> I am only wondering if anyone has managed to successfully compile
> Clamav from CVS, or even the snapshot-20050417 at all.
>
> My normal built methods do fail when I do
I am always running on FreeBSD (4.11 and 5.4) if that matters.
I am only wondering if anyone has managed to successfully compile
Clamav from CVS, or even the snapshot-20050417 at all.
My normal built methods do fail when I do 'make'.
I don't see anything in the ChangeLog to help me get out of thi
