Re: [Clamav-users] CVS (20050625) compile fails

2005-06-25 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050625 16:27]: wrote: > > > On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > ; I am trying to compile the CVS version on FreeBSD 4.11, but it fails > ; as follows: > ; > [.. snip ..] > ; > ; server-th.c: In function `acceptloop_th': > ; server-th.c:437:

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS (20050625) compile fails

2005-06-25 Thread Andy Fiddaman
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Odhiambo Washington wrote: ; I am trying to compile the CVS version on FreeBSD 4.11, but it fails ; as follows: ; [.. snip ..] ; ; server-th.c: In function `acceptloop_th': ; server-th.c:437: warning: passing arg 3 of `thrmgr_new' makes integer from pointer without a cast ;

[Clamav-users] CVS (20050625) compile fails

2005-06-25 Thread Odhiambo Washington
I am trying to compile the CVS version on FreeBSD 4.11, but it fails as follows: creating clamscan Making all in clamd source='../shared/output.c' object='output.o' libtool=no DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /usr/local/bin/bash ../depcomp gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I .. -I.. -I../shared -I../libcla

[Clamav-users] CVS milter compile problem

2005-05-20 Thread Lutz Rabing
hi, the latest cvs version does not compile on FreeeBSD 4.11-STABLE: clamav-milter.o: In function `main': /usr/home/omc/CLAMAV/clamav-devel/clamav-milter/clamav-milter.c:1573: undefined reference to `smfi_opensocket' any ideas? lutz rabing ___ htt

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS and snapshot-20050417

2005-04-19 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 09:20 +, Andy Fiddaman wrote: > > Fair enough, but it's a recent change which is why I wondered if it was > intentional. It's not a recent change, we just don't change the build that often. -trog signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS and snapshot-20050417

2005-04-19 Thread Andy Fiddaman
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Trog wrote: ; On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 18:22 +, Andy Fiddaman wrote: ; > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Trog wrote: ; > ; ; > ; Run autoreconf ; > ; > Is this something that has changed and will stay this way ? I don't ; > currently have the auto utilities on my Sun servers and don't r

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS and snapshot-20050417

2005-04-19 Thread Trog
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 18:22 +, Andy Fiddaman wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Trog wrote: > ; > ; Run autoreconf > > Is this something that has changed and will stay this way ? I don't > currently have the auto utilities on my Sun servers and don't really want > to add and have to maintain them.

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS and snapshot-20050417

2005-04-18 Thread Andy Fiddaman
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Trog wrote: ; On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 13:50 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: ; > I am always running on FreeBSD (4.11 and 5.4) if that matters. ; > I am only wondering if anyone has managed to successfully compile ; > Clamav from CVS, or even the snapshot-20050417 at all. ; > ;

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS and snapshot-20050417

2005-04-18 Thread Trog
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 13:50 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I am always running on FreeBSD (4.11 and 5.4) if that matters. > I am only wondering if anyone has managed to successfully compile > Clamav from CVS, or even the snapshot-20050417 at all. > > My normal built methods do fail when I do

[Clamav-users] CVS and snapshot-20050417

2005-04-18 Thread Odhiambo Washington
I am always running on FreeBSD (4.11 and 5.4) if that matters. I am only wondering if anyone has managed to successfully compile Clamav from CVS, or even the snapshot-20050417 at all. My normal built methods do fail when I do 'make'. I don't see anything in the ChangeLog to help me get out of thi

[Clamav-users] CVS build failure

2004-12-13 Thread Odhiambo Washington
I am trying to compile CVS version, checked out 200412131730 on FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE. Here is what comes up: creating clamscan Making all in clamd source='../shared/output.c' object='output.o' libtool=no depfile='.deps/output.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/output.TPo' depmode=gcc /usr/loc al/bin/bash ..

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-users] CVS Clamav status

2004-09-14 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 10:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Strange...I must messed with sources becouse program based on old clamav snapshot > worked with archves > properly but now test signature is only detected in plain text files and any > decompression like zip, gzip, > cab etc seems that ca

[Clamav-users] Re: [Clamav-users] CVS Clamav status

2004-09-14 Thread brandys
Hello, Wiadomość Oryginalna Od: Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Do: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:57:43 +0200 Temat: Re: [Clamav-users] CVS Clamav status >On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:48:57 +0200 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hello, >> >>

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS Clamav status

2004-09-13 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:48:57 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > What is the status of current CVS version ? Is it running without bugs > ? = I discovered something strange - failure to process any cab files > (tested= > with sample program and libclamav library from current CVS). Does >

[Clamav-users] CVS Clamav status

2004-09-13 Thread brandys
Hello, What is the status of current CVS version ? Is it running without bugs ? I discovered something strange - failure to process any cab files (tested with sample program and libclamav library from current CVS). Does somebody confirm that clamscan with new libsmpack can process CAB files wit

[Clamav-users] CVS

2004-04-21 Thread Matthew Trent
mail1:/usr/src# cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/clamav co clamav-devel cvs server: Updating clamav-devel ... cvs server: Updating clamav-devel/docs/Polish cvs server: [15:34:49] waiting for nigelhorne's lock in /cvsroot/clamav/clamav-devel/docs/Polish cvs server: [15:35:19] waiting for

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS 20040308 doesnt build

2004-03-10 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Trog wrote: On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 12:18, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: Just wanted to say that cygwin and OSF port is also broken because others.c: In function `poll_fd': others.c:308: error: storage size of `tv' isn't known (hopefully) fixed in CVS. OSF port : fixed Cygwin port : /bin/bas

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS 20040308 doesnt build

2004-03-09 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 12:18, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > Krištof Petr wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > it doesnt build on linux with > > I tried replying to this email earlier. > Just wanted to say that cygwin and OSF port is also broken because > > others.c: In function `poll_fd': > others.c:308: error:

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS 20040308 doesnt build

2004-03-09 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Krištof Petr wrote: Hi, it doesnt build on linux with I tried replying to this email earlier. Just wanted to say that cygwin and OSF port is also broken because others.c: In function `poll_fd': others.c:308: error: storage size of `tv' isn't known and Redhat 7.3 build is also broken because it ha

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS 20040308 doesnt build

2004-03-09 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:44:29 +0100 Krištof Petr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/clamd/cfgfile.o', needed by > `clamav-milter Mon Mar 8 22:26:48 CET 2004 (tk) - * clamav-milter: fixed a typo in Makefile -- oo.

[Clamav-users] CVS 20040308 doesnt build

2004-03-08 Thread Krištof Petr
Hi, it doesnt build on linux with ./configure \ --enable-milter \ --enable-id-check \ --disable-clamav \ --with-user=clamav \ --with-group=clamav \ --with-dbdir=/var/lib/clamav make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/clamav-20040308/clam

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS from 19022004 - still no fix for timeouts/runaway children

2004-02-20 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Trog wrote: > On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 12:50, Mike Brodbelt wrote: >>to a specific piece of mail. The thread timeout on clamd is set to 300 >>seconds, so I presume the offending mail would have arrived at around >>11:07:31. There are 4 possible candidate messages that were timestamped >>at 11:07:30,

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS from 19022004 - still no fix for timeouts/runaway children

2004-02-20 Thread Trog
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 12:50, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > I'm only using it to scan mail, and the filter is set up such that when > it dies, sendmail just bypasses it. The message in question will have > been delivered. It's not immediately obvious to me how I can connect the > log message:- > > Feb 20

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS from 19022004 - still no fix for timeouts/runaway children

2004-02-20 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Trog wrote: > On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 11:49, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Just a quick note to the list to point out that the recent changes >>appear not to have fixed the longstanding problem with clamav-milter's >>connections to clamd dying and then gradually growing the process list. >> > >

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS from 19022004 - still no fix for timeouts/runaway children

2004-02-20 Thread Trog
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 11:49, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Hi, > > Just a quick note to the list to point out that the recent changes > appear not to have fixed the longstanding problem with clamav-milter's > connections to clamd dying and then gradually growing the process list. > And the clamd logs s

[Clamav-users] CVS from 19022004 - still no fix for timeouts/runaway children

2004-02-20 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Hi, Just a quick note to the list to point out that the recent changes appear not to have fixed the longstanding problem with clamav-milter's connections to clamd dying and then gradually growing the process list. I removed clamav from my mail setup a couple of weeks ago due to this, but put yest

[Clamav-users] CVS....

2003-10-17 Thread Stewart MacLund
Interesting. $ clamscan -V clamscan / ClamAV version 20030829 $ clamd -V clamd / ClamAV version 20030829 I seem to be having the same issue. I am using the anonymous server, with a standard configure/make/make install dance, with no errors. And it seems to be running fine, detecting the eicar

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS Reverted?

2003-10-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 07:11:23 +0100 Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So the cvs pserver seems to be very much out of step with the current > code. Do not forget that Sourceforge have 2 different CVS services, I didn't know it, thanks for the clarification. I will ask Luca Gibelli - our a

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS Reverted?

2003-10-16 Thread Graham Murray
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Everything is OK. Actual changelog: > > Fri Oct 17 05:08:22 CEST 2003 (tk) > -- > * new Spanish documentation on ClamAV + Sendmail integration by > Erick Ivaan Lopez Carreon I have just performed a "cvs update" and th

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS Reverted?

2003-10-16 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20031017 06:36]: wrote: > On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 22:28:38 +0100 > Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it my imagination or has the (anonymous) CVS reverted to an older > > version? A couple of days ago I updated and the version reported as > > 20031014

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS Reverted?

2003-10-16 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 22:28:38 +0100 Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it my imagination or has the (anonymous) CVS reverted to an older > version? A couple of days ago I updated and the version reported as > 20031014. Now having done a "cvs update" again, it is reporting as > 20030829.

[Clamav-users] CVS Reverted?

2003-10-16 Thread Graham Murray
Is it my imagination or has the (anonymous) CVS reverted to an older version? A couple of days ago I updated and the version reported as 20031014. Now having done a "cvs update" again, it is reporting as 20030829. Is this reversion deliberate (eg because of a problem) or has the Sourceforge cvs pse

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS -> stable download

2003-10-08 Thread Tomasz Kojm
> How long between CVS being declared "wonderfully stable" and the code > getting released as a real version in sourceforge? I'm mildly disinclined > to use CVS on my server. CVS version is really good (well, with except for zziplib), far more stable than 0.60. Stable version should be avail

[Clamav-users] CVS -> stable download

2003-10-08 Thread Stewart MacLund
How long between CVS being declared "wonderfully stable" and the code getting released as a real version in sourceforge? I'm mildly disinclined to use CVS on my server. Sundie... --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS changes

2003-09-29 Thread Jim Gifford
- Original Message - From: "Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 6:28 AM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] CVS changes > Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > Hi, > > > > there are some important changes in CVS. Please

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS changes

2003-09-29 Thread Rob
Tomasz Kojm wrote: Hi, there are some important changes in CVS. Please test the latest version - thanks ! The stable release will be available at the end of the next week. Next major changes coming soon. Hi Thomas, When I compile the new snapshot on a FreeBSD machine I get the following error:

Re: [Clamav-users] CVS changes

2003-09-29 Thread Wouter de Vries
Are those segmentation problems fixed as well? Tomasz Kojm wrote: Hi, there are some important changes in CVS. Please test the latest version - thanks ! The stable release will be available at the end of the next week. Next major changes coming soon. Actual ChangeLog: Mon Sep 29 13:42:51 CEST 2

[Clamav-users] CVS changes

2003-09-29 Thread Tomasz Kojm
Hi, there are some important changes in CVS. Please test the latest version - thanks ! The stable release will be available at the end of the next week. Next major changes coming soon. Actual ChangeLog: Mon Sep 29 13:42:51 CEST 2003 (tk) -- * libclamav: initial