Dennis Peterson wrote:
> So what was wrong with the time? Did your autoscan problem get fixed?
> Glad it's not tomorrow there any longer (it's always today no matter
> where you are :) )
There was nothing wrong with my actual time settings. More to do with
*BSD needing my timezone to be copied t
Steve Holdoway wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:25:26 -0800
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
carren stuart wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Not quite right yet, Carren.
Sigh
If it's not right this time I'm throwing this thing out the window and
going back to a slate and chalk!
I t
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:25:26 -0800
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> carren stuart wrote:
> > Dennis Peterson wrote:
> >
> >> Not quite right yet, Carren.
> >
> > Sigh
> >
> > If it's not right this time I'm throwing this thing out the window and
> > going back to a slate and ch
carren stuart wrote:
Anyway, those of you who were more than happy to have my mail going to
your SPAM folder - you may consider this an apology. Those of you who
actually did your best to help me, without making me feel like an idiot
- may consider it an official "Thank you".
So what was wro
carren stuart wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Not quite right yet, Carren.
Sigh
If it's not right this time I'm throwing this thing out the window and
going back to a slate and chalk!
I think the Maori tradition for successes like this is to go out and
have a beer.
dp
___
Adolf Belka wrote:
> I am pleased to tell you that it looks okay to me now. The E-mail
> headers are correct and it is showing up with the correct local time
> in my E-mail listing. Also no Date in future hit with Spamassassin.
>
> No need to hunt for the slate and chalk anymore. :-))
Thank yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
carren stuart wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> Not quite right yet, Carren.
>
> Sigh
>
> If it's not right this time I'm throwing this thing out the window and
> going back to a slate and chalk!
> _
carren stuart wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Not quite right yet, Carren.
Sigh
If it's not right this time I'm throwing this thing out the window and
going back to a slate and chalk!
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Not quite right yet, Carren.
Sigh
If it's not right this time I'm throwing this thing out the window and
going back to a slate and chalk!
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:40:04PM -0500, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> >I've spent the last couple of days working on this trying to find out
> >exactly what the problem was. It turned out to be a *bsd issue which I
> >have now corrected (It was NOT my system clock or timezone setting) I've
> >sent mys
carren stuart wrote:
I've sent myself several test messages and the time/timezone now
seems to be correct. Would you mind confirming that for me please?
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. I don't know what the original
problem was, but it's still hitting DATE_IN_FUTURE :)
The Date header (
carren stuart wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
There really is an error in your system's timezone or clock/calendar,
but let's focus on your auto scan because that is why you are here.
I've spent the last couple of days working on this trying to find out
exactly what the problem was. It turned
carren stuart wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
There really is an error in your system's timezone or clock/calendar,
but let's focus on your auto scan because that is why you are here.
I've spent the last couple of days working on this trying to find out
exactly what the problem was. It turned
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> There really is an error in your system's timezone or clock/calendar,
> but let's focus on your auto scan because that is why you are here.
I've spent the last couple of days working on this trying to find out
exactly what the problem was. It turned out to be a *bsd issu
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:34:24 +1300
Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thankyou for your informative suggestion. I posted as an example of
> what a correctly set up mail client from someone in New Zealand
> should look like for an argumentative poster, also from godzone, to
> see what thei
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 05:00:14 -0500
Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday February 17, 2007 at 04:20:22 (AM) Steve Holdoway wrote:
>
> > OK, I'm in Christchurch. What's my timezone come up as???
>
> Please don't top post. If you don't know what that means, Google for it.
>
> I
carren stuart wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugg, as much as I hate to continue this OT subject. Something with your
time
is jacked. Whether it be your time or timezone I don't really care or care
enough to tell you where you have it wrong. You mail is showing up in
peoples mailboxes as if
At 01:20 17-02-2007, Steve Holdoway wrote:
OK, I'm in Christchurch. What's my timezone come up as???
The time zone in your email was +1300 which is correct for New
Zealand. The Standard Time zone for Christchurch is UTC +
1200. It's UTC + 1300 currently with DST.
Regards,
-sm
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Holdoway wrote:
> OK, I'm in Christchurch. What's my timezone come up as???
>
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:58:04 +
> carren stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Ugg, as much as I hate to continue this OT subject
On Saturday February 17, 2007 at 04:20:22 (AM) Steve Holdoway wrote:
> OK, I'm in Christchurch. What's my timezone come up as???
Please don't top post. If you don't know what that means, Google for it.
I am assuming you are referring to: Christchurch, New Zealand .
Check out these two URLS, whi
OK, I'm in Christchurch. What's my timezone come up as???
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:58:04 +
carren stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Ugg, as much as I hate to continue this OT subject. Something with your
> > time
> > is jacked. Whether it be your time or time
At 03:58 AM 2/17/2007, carren stuart wrote:
We are currently in daylight savings time which IS UTC +13
See this link for an explanation:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=22
Carren,
The headers of your message contain:
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ip-58-28-52-188.ipnet.xnet
carren stuart wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugg, as much as I hate to continue this OT subject. Something with your
time
is jacked. Whether it be your time or timezone I don't really care or care
enough to tell you where you have it wrong. You mail is showing up in
peoples mailboxes as if
carren stuart wrote:
We are currently in daylight savings time which IS UTC +13
See this link for an explanation:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=22
I'm sorry ... but I don't know how to explain this any better than it's
already been explained.
Right, you're in NZ, but tha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ugg, as much as I hate to continue this OT subject. Something with your
> time
> is jacked. Whether it be your time or timezone I don't really care or care
> enough to tell you where you have it wrong. You mail is showing up in
> peoples mailboxes as if were sent tomo
On Fri, February 16, 2007 3:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> carren stuart wrote:
>>
>> At last - someone who actually gets it. Thank you Nick!
>>
>> For the rest of you, I shall repeat - my timezone AND system time is
>> set correctly.
>>
> Ugg, as much as I hate to continue this OT subject. Som
carren stuart wrote:
At last - someone who actually gets it. Thank you Nick!
For the rest of you, I shall repeat - my timezone AND system time is set
correctly.
Ugg, as much as I hate to continue this OT subject. Something with your time
is jacked. Whether it be your time or timezone I don'
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> I wonder why your header looks like this:
> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:52:45 +
> From: carren stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061227)
>
> The offset is wrong for NZDT.
See Nick's post.
> Were you able to solve your problem?
Not y
Nick Leverton wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 04:14, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> carren stuart wrote:
>>> Jim Maul wrote:
ack. Would you rather someone reply and say "wow, that sucks, but i
cant help you"?
>>> Actually, yes I would. At least that would be acknowledgment of my
>>> probl
carren stuart wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Um excuse me ... for your information, my system clock is set correctly.
And before you ask - yes, I just double checked it (specially for you).
So long ... and thanks for all the fish.
So what the heck time zone are you whining from? It's really to
On Friday 16 February 2007 04:14, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> carren stuart wrote:
> > Jim Maul wrote:
> >> ack. Would you rather someone reply and say "wow, that sucks, but i
> >> cant help you"?
> >
> > Actually, yes I would. At least that would be acknowledgment of my
> > problem and request.
>
>
Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Um excuse me ... for your information, my system clock is set correctly.
>> And before you ask - yes, I just double checked it (specially for you).
>>
>> So long ... and thanks for all the fish.
>
> So what the heck time zone are you whining from? It's really tomorrow
>
carren stuart wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Maybe people are looking at the post time of your messages and see you
can't even manage your system clock so aren't surprised you're whining
about configuring something as complex as a fully integrated anti-virus
solution.
Um excuse me ... for your
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Maybe people are looking at the post time of your messages and see you
> can't even manage your system clock so aren't surprised you're whining
> about configuring something as complex as a fully integrated anti-virus
> solution.
Um excuse me ... for your information, my
carren stuart wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
ack. Would you rather someone reply and say "wow, that sucks, but i
cant help you"?
Actually, yes I would. At least that would be acknowledgment of my
problem and request.
Maybe people are looking at the post time of your messages and see you
can't
Steve Basford wrote:
>
> carren stuart wrote:
>> Is there some reason why my posts aren't even being acknowledged? I
>> can't believe that nobody knows the answer to my question. This IS the
>> users list and I'm a user, so could somebody PLEASE help me with this.
>>
>>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I can't
Jim Maul wrote:
> ack. Would you rather someone reply and say "wow, that sucks, but i
> cant help you"?
Actually, yes I would. At least that would be acknowledgment of my
problem and request.
> You provided no useful information either. Saying:
>
> Whenever I enable auto-scan I get the foll
carren stuart wrote:
> Is there some reason why my posts aren't even being acknowledged? I
> can't believe that nobody knows the answer to my question. This IS the
> users list and I'm a user, so could somebody PLEASE help me with this.
>
>
Hi,
Sorry I can't really help you... but I did find
carren stuart wrote:
carren stuart wrote:
A while back, I wrote:
I'm running Clamav on DesktopBSD, with Klamav as the front end. Clamav
is working fine and has detected the eicar test files as expected but I
cannot get auto-scanning to work. Whenever I enable auto-scan I get the
following err
carren stuart wrote:
> A while back, I wrote:
>
>
>> I'm running Clamav on DesktopBSD, with Klamav as the front end. Clamav
>> is working fine and has detected the eicar test files as expected but I
>> cannot get auto-scanning to work. Whenever I enable auto-scan I get the
>> following error:
>>
A while back, I wrote:
> I'm running Clamav on DesktopBSD, with Klamav as the front end. Clamav
> is working fine and has detected the eicar test files as expected but I
> cannot get auto-scanning to work. Whenever I enable auto-scan I get the
> following error:
>
> "The auto-scan process died u
Hi :-)
I'm running Clamav on DesktopBSD, with Klamav as the front end. Clamav
is working fine and has detected the eicar test files as expected but I
cannot get auto-scanning to work. Whenever I enable auto-scan I get the
following error:
"The auto-scan process died unexpectedly"
I have dazuko
42 matches
Mail list logo
