Re: [Clamav-users] ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio

2005-02-01 Thread Brian Morrison
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:03:18 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Shaun Bugler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, just want to know why does this option exist? We have had a > couple emails containing "legit" zips being stopped because of this > option, just want to know the benifits of having this option

[Clamav-users] ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio

2005-02-01 Thread Shaun Bugler
Hi, just want to know why does this option exist? We have had a couple emails containing "legit" zips being stopped because of this option, just want to know the benifits of having this option enabled. tx shaun bugler ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin

Re: [Clamav-users] ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio problem

2005-01-10 Thread Chris Masters
Ahh OK, it's on a file by file basis - thanks. --- Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Masters wrote: > > > I'm guessing that the ratio is calculated > literally as > > the ratio difference between the inflated and > deflated > > size. > > > > 1100/54 = 20 > > > > Am I misunderstanding t

Re: [Clamav-users] ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio problem

2005-01-10 Thread Matt
Chris Masters wrote: > I'm guessing that the ratio is calculated literally as > the ratio difference between the inflated and deflated > size. > > 1100/54 = 20 > > Am I misunderstanding the ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio > or is this a bug? If I remember correctly, the compression ratio is calc

[Clamav-users] ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio problem

2005-01-10 Thread Chris Masters
Hi All, I have a problem with a zip file with clamav-0.80: inflated = 54KB deflated = 1100KB I have ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio set to default (250) and this zip file is being tagged as Oversized.Zip. I'm guessing that the ratio is calculated literally as the ratio difference between the i