Re: [Clamav-users] Anomaly when scanning a tar.gz file

2009-04-05 Thread Sarocet
Paul Kosinski wrote: > 09:51:08 u...@host:~/src/openssl> clamscan -ri openssl-0.9.8k/ > > --- SCAN SUMMARY --- > Known viruses: 537879 > Engine version: 0.95 > Scanned directories: 134 > Scanned files: 2003 > Infected files: 0 > Data scanned: 13.86 MB > Data read: 12.99 MB (ratio 1.

Re: [Clamav-users] Anomaly when scanning a tar.gz file

2009-04-04 Thread Nathan Brink
Paul Kosinski wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed the following anomaly when scanning a tar.gz file compared > to scanning the result of untarring it. Scanning the tar.gz file > results in less "data read" than scanning the files which it expands > to (as one would expect), but the "data scanned" amount is

[Clamav-users] Anomaly when scanning a tar.gz file

2009-04-04 Thread Paul Kosinski
Hi, I noticed the following anomaly when scanning a tar.gz file compared to scanning the result of untarring it. Scanning the tar.gz file results in less "data read" than scanning the files which it expands to (as one would expect), but the "data scanned" amount is *much* more for the tar.gz file