--- "Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, des wrote:
>
> > "Your disk is slow" or "don't scan large files" is
> a common response.
>
> Well, I'm using ramdisk for temp so I don't think
> that's it.
>
> > If you can provide a sample file to Trog to help
>
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, des wrote:
> "Your disk is slow" or "don't scan large files" is a common response.
Well, I'm using ramdisk for temp so I don't think that's it.
> If you can provide a sample file to Trog to help find out what the
> real issue is that would be great.
Sent, hopefuly it helps.
On 3/16/06, Christopher X. Candreva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running into issues where (so far as I can tell) .ppt files can take a
> long time to scan. As an exmaple, I have a 2.8 meg 5 slide .ppt file that
> takes 90 seconds to scan on an otherwise-quiet 1.5ghz Athlon.
>
> For camparison,
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 12:56 -0500, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> I'm running into issues where (so far as I can tell) .ppt files can take a
> long time to scan. As an exmaple, I have a 2.8 meg 5 slide .ppt file that
> takes 90 seconds to scan on an otherwise-quiet 1.5ghz Athlon.
>
Can you s
I'm running into issues where (so far as I can tell) .ppt files can take a
long time to scan. As an exmaple, I have a 2.8 meg 5 slide .ppt file that
takes 90 seconds to scan on an otherwise-quiet 1.5ghz Athlon.
For camparison, a random 3 meg .pdf file scanned in under a second.
Is this normal
