On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Erwan David wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 09:38:30PM CET, Benny Pedersen said:
>> francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
>>
>> >This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
>> >daemon handles things.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
>
>
>> This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
>> daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
>> do the same?
>
>
> if you lik
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
>
>
>> This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
>> daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
>> do the same?
>
>
> if you lik
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:56 PM, francis picabia wrote:
> I have a primary MX running Redhat, with postfix+amavisd+clamav
>
> I also have a secondary MX and SMTP gateway running Debian, with
> postfix+amavisd-new+clamav
>
> Recently we adopted use of Sanesecurity additions, usin
I have a primary MX running Redhat, with postfix+amavisd+clamav
I also have a secondary MX and SMTP gateway running Debian, with
postfix+amavisd-new+clamav
Recently we adopted use of Sanesecurity additions, using the scamp script
on both MX and SMTP.
Root receives virus notifications on the SMTP
