Nigel Horne wrote:
4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it!
I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate this.
I had success with the patch produced by Thomas Lamy at least for the 2
message that I have - are there some issues with that one ?
Stefan
Ola Thoresen wrote:
I have captured several messages, and sent them to Thomas and Nigel.
This seems to be an issue with some messages with attachments of
"Content-type: application/mac-binhex40;"
I can confirm this and I can confirm too that thomas' patch fixes the
problem here.
Stefan
-
Franco Gasperino wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2004 02:21 am, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
ok after setting up a complicated testbed I managed to capture a message
which results in a 2GB(!) memoryallocation of the latest snapshot
02012004 in less then 3 seconds ...
unfortunatly I'm unab
Ola Thoresen wrote:
typically our mailrelays do run out of memory(1GB physical and 2Gb swap)
after a few (maybe 10 to 15) minutes with the snapshots 20040113 and
20040119 under load
We see this problem as well.
On a couple of servers (Fedora Core 1, kernel 2.4.22-1.2149.nptl) with
reasonably hi
Hi All!
Since clamd in 0.65 is much too unstable here (stops responding within
minutes), we have been running several development snapshots here. all
the snapshots from the last 14 days or so seem to massivily leak memory.
typically our mailrelays do run out of memory(1GB physical and 2Gb swap)
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 at 19:25:36 +, Antony Stone wrote:
Clamscan's working fine for me here (Linux 2.4.23, ClamAV 0.60, with the big
database update just released, therefore 27645 signatures).
27645? How come? The database at the moment contains 19799 signatures.
I thi
There seems to be a problem with the new TCPAddr support in the latest
snapshots - setting TCPSocket without setting TCPAddr (happens for
example when upgrading from an older version) "reliably" segfaults upon
startup on my system (Debian Testing/x86).
Stefan
-
Kelsey Cummings wrote:
The clamav-devel-20031009 version seems to be segfault free which is a
great improvement over some of the previous versions. However, I've had it
deadlock a couple of times over the past few days. Has anyone else seen
this behavior?
Symptoms are pretty straight forward. I
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Okay, I know this is not good at all, that I run the CVS version of clamav
on a production box. It's suicide. I've run the daily snapshots for some
time without disappointment when it comes to supervising the service with
daemontools. However, something in CVS seems to co
Marc Balmer wrote:
Hi
I have been running clamd 0.60 for quite some time now on our mail
gateway in a milter setup (not the ClamAV milter, but our own one that
"speaks" the clamd protocol).
clamd in this version is not stable and I wonder if it is the server
part or libclamav thats causing the tro
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 19:38:10 +0200
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
STREAM support is long awaited feature by me. Unfortunately it seems
badly designed.
The idea of the protocol is based on OpenAntiVirus ScannerDaemon's POST
command, with some enhance
with should
help with some of these issues (by incorporating an updated ripmime-library)
Stefan
--
Stefan Kaltenbrunner
mastermind at madness dot at
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
before - I have not yet discovered any serious showstopper (apart from
the annoying behaviour of binding to all available interfaces when using
in TCP-mode - with is easily fixed with a oneliner) during the last days.
regards
Stefan Kaltenbrunner
--
Stefan Kaltenbrunner
mast
13 matches
Mail list logo
