upgrade to sendmail-8.13
>fix this issue?
Yes. The upgrade will fix your issue.
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
ld be using a dedicated server host, due to the
>number of users running the url script??
Such scripts are not suited for a shared server environment. There
are several ways to distribute (web) load. You can use mod_rewrite,
DNS round-robin, web proxies or load balancers. Most people go f
es but no standards for file extensions.
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
ch we do not consider to have any security impact."
>vulnerability, so I am probably doing something wrong. But what?
You are not doing anything wrong. Get a newer version of bzip2.
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
At 02:18 09-07-2008, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>Please have a look at the comment #12 on the bug page
If you encourage people to build from ports, it's more difficult to
get feedback from those users for release candidates.
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us
either try and find a contact at the other end to debug or else wait
and see whether anyone on the mailing list reported a related error
when running freshclam.
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.cla
greater burden to try to be as secure as possible. Even
If you are using the milter as a security tool, you would have to do
more filtering than what's currently implemented to prevent problems
downstream.
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us build a compr
At 12:41 17-04-2008, Jerry Ferguson wrote:
> no, I downloaded and compiled from source which I have done since v 0.85
>pkgsrc is version 92.1 which I will use for now.
pkgsrc contains version 0.93.
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us build a compreh
orted for multi-threaded programs.
That's why the process exits. Multi-thread programs such as milters
should not access _res like that if you have BIND9 libs.
Are you using the version in pkgsrc? it contains the required patch.
Regards,
-sm
___
only works if the source host is not
behind a hardware firewall or if the message doesn't go through a relay.
It can be used as an additional data point for content filtering or
for policy enforcement to shed the load on the mail server.
Regards,
-sm
why it may have caused the clamd failure.
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
as
Email.Phishing.RB-1222.
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
At 08:37 03-08-2007, Marshall Dudley wrote:
>G.W. Haywood wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 SM wrote:
> >
> > There's no reason to believe that the Romanian mafia don't read this
It would have been better to trim your reply instead
At 03:55 03-08-2007, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 SM wrote:
>
> > Visa and Mastercard are insisting that I put a virus scanner on the
[snip]
>This isn't meant as some sort of character assaination, it's just an
>observation of the facts from what I'
any other virus scanner out there
>I can install on FREEBSD to satisfy them?
If they find out that you running such an old virus scanner and your
server has security vulnerabilities, wouldn't they shut you down as well?
Regards,
-sm
___
Help
ort of, but with the following output:
AllowSupplementaryGroups yes
http://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes090
Regards,
-sm
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
At 01:20 17-02-2007, Steve Holdoway wrote:
OK, I'm in Christchurch. What's my timezone come up as???
The time zone in your email was +1300 which is correct for New
Zealand. The Standard Time zone for Christchurch is UTC +
1200. It's UTC + 1300 currently with DST.
ccept, then bounce the mail if it contains a
virus? That's not a good idea as the sender address may be forged.
Regards,
-sm
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
At 09:39 22-08-2005, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Your claim is nonsense. MX records tell other systems where *you* would like
mail addressed to you to go. Where they actually go depends entirely on the
sending system. If you have a system on the Internet and port 25 is active,
you will get connections
about the above.
Regards,
-sm
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
At 22:24 21-08-2005, Dennis Peterson wrote:
SM said:
> At 21:50 21-08-2005, Roger Rustad wrote:
>>If I have, say, exchange.domain.com, I'm assuming that's cool, as
>>any @domain.com mail will go to the mx record, and not the A record.
>
> Yes, mail to @domain won&#
At 21:50 21-08-2005, Roger Rustad wrote:
If I have, say, exchange.domain.com, I'm assuming that's cool, as
any @domain.com mail will go to the mx record, and not the A record.
Yes, mail to @domain won't go to exchange.domain as it is not listed as a MX
n my email servers
Your email servers may receive viruses by email if you have a MX
record pointing to them.
Regards,
-sm
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
23 matches
Mail list logo
