Re: [clamav-users] am I understanding this right?

2003-06-09 Thread Raymond Norton
> > > If we're talking MailScanner with ClamAV you can choose what to do but > > most deliver the message with the infected attachment replaced by a > > message. The attachments are stored on the mail server for closer > inspection. Basically, everything that is not infected is deliverd > I am tr

Re: [clamav-users] am I understanding this right?

2003-06-09 Thread Raymond Norton
derstanding this right? > * Raymond Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030609 09:52]: wrote: > > I am looking through the mailscanner site, and see in a FAQ someone > > is complaining clamav does not disinfect files. Is that right, it > > only marks the file as infected? >

[clamav-users] am I understanding this right?

2003-06-09 Thread Raymond Norton
I am looking through the mailscanner site, and see in a FAQ someone is complaining clamav does not disinfect files. Is that right, it only marks the file as infected?       Raymond     -   Defeat is a matter of choice.     

[clamav-users] pardon me if this has been covered

2003-06-05 Thread Raymond Norton
First, is there a searchable version of the mailing list?     Presently I use mailscanner with sendmail, and have configured it to use sophos. This works very nice, but not free. Can clamav be incorporated to work in mailscanner, or is there another way to scan all user mailboxes? Almost all