Re: [clamav-users] Different results: Clamscan vs ClamWin

2017-05-03 Thread Peter B.
On 05/03/2017 11:38 AM, Al Varnell wrote: > Not sure what you mean by "MD5 match" but the signature is a complex logical > one, not a hash: Oh... :) That was the answer to Rafael Ferreira asking if I validated the files' checksums to match both on Linux + Windows. Yes, I did! and the MD5 hashcod

Re: [clamav-users] Different results: Clamscan vs ClamWin

2017-05-03 Thread Peter B.
Thanks for your replies! On 05/03/2017 02:18 AM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > First thing I notice is that you are running two different versions of > ClamAV. I know, but: *) v0.99.1 is the most recent version of ClamWin, so I can't go higher *) ClamWin also detected the virus with v0.

[clamav-users] Different results: Clamscan vs ClamWin

2017-05-02 Thread Peter B.
uot;$ sudo freshclam". No change. Grateful for any information why clamscan finds less than clamwin...? :) Thank you in advance, Peter B. Software versions on my setups: Xubuntu 12.04.1 (64bit): - ClamAV 0.99.2/23350/T