Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd 0.90RC1.1 version string

2006-10-27 Thread Ovidiu Bivolaru
:42:49 2006 # telnet localhost 3310 VERSION ClamAV 0.90RC1.1/2121/Fri Oct 27 11:42:49 2006 Why is that ? Due DB updates ? Thank you. Regards, Ovidiu Robert Allerstorfer wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, 23:30 GMT+03 Ovidiu Bivolaru wrote: > > >> Example: >> v. 0.88.5 >&

[Clamav-users] Clamd 0.90RC1.1 version string

2006-10-26 Thread Ovidiu Bivolaru
Hi, I have an application which is using clamd. Until clamav 0.88.5 the answer for "VERSION" command was "ClamAV program_version/db_version/db_date". Since ClamAV 0.90RC1.1 the answer to "VERSION" is "ClamAV program_version". Is this a known issue ? It would make impossible to obtain database

Re: [Clamav-users] segfaults

2004-08-27 Thread Ovidiu Bivolaru
Hi, I think you need libgmp installed in order to support digital signatures. Check this link: http://www.gnu.org/software/gmp/gmp.html Regards, Ovidiu hondaman wrote: Seem to be having trouble. I just installed clamav .075 on a fc2 x86-64 box. When I attempt to run freshclam -d, i segfault.

Re: [Clamav-users] Question

2004-08-27 Thread Ovidiu Bivolaru
Aug 2004 at 20:22:34 +0300, Ovidiu Bivolaru wrote: I'm using ClamAV 0.75.1 and I encounter one of the Oversized.zip issues. I've read a few threads about this issue and I've learned that maxcompressionratio could be 200 ~ 99.5% compression. I have a zip file which reports a compr

[Clamav-users] Question

2004-08-26 Thread Ovidiu Bivolaru
Hi, I'm using ClamAV 0.75.1 and I encounter one of the Oversized.zip issues. I've read a few threads about this issue and I've learned that maxcompressionratio could be 200 ~ 99.5% compression. I have a zip file which reports a compression ratio of 466. Is this possible ? bash-2.05b$ clamscan