On 17/01/2022 15:26, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
On 17/01/2022 14:33, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Not quite. I have taken over the packaging of this and the
justification of packaging the sigs is partly that the tool will work
and
On 17/01/2022 15:14, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 9:53 AM Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users
mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>>
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
> - not
> have to install s
On 17/01/2022 15:06, Arjen de Korte via clamav-users wrote:
Citeren Nick Howitt via clamav-users :
Not quite. I have taken over the packaging of this and the
justification of packaging the sigs is partly that the tool will work
and scan out of the box, partly for the offline consideration
On 17/01/2022 14:33, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to package ClamAV 0.103.5 for ClearOS. Normally they
package the
latest three signature files listed above with their distributable rpm in
the same way that EPEL do so
Phone
On Jan 17, 2022, at 09:12, Nick Howitt via clamav-users
wrote:
Please tell that to EPEL as well. We want to be able to distribute a package
which, in emergency, can be transferred to a standalone (read compromised
device removed from the network) and have the rpm install something whic
ll any/all of
the files that are missing. That is probably the best way to do it.
--Maarten
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 8:32 AM Nick Howitt via clamav-users
mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>>
wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to package ClamAV 0.103.5 for ClearOS. Normally they
pa
Hi,
I am trying to package ClamAV 0.103.5 for ClearOS. Normally they
package the latest three signature files listed above with their
distributable rpm in the same way that EPEL do so they have a
working package on installation rather than requiring freshclam to
run f
But If you are behind another virus scanner, it can't so easily be
intercepted and trip up the scanner.
On 12/12/2019 19:56, Al Varnell via clamav-users wrote:
Each DB's integrity is protected by an embedded signature, so https
adds little or nothing to security here.
-Al-
On Dec 12, 2019, a
2019 16:33, Nick Howitt wrote:
I have been using cvd signature files but over the last couple of
days, I've seen the daily.cvd disappear and be replaced with the much
larger daily.cld file. If I delete the daily.cld then run freshclam I
receive the daily.cvd again, but it has switched to
I have been using cvd signature files but over the last couple of days,
I've seen the daily.cvd disappear and be replaced with the much larger
daily.cld file. If I delete the daily.cld then run freshclam I receive
the daily.cvd again, but it has switched to the cld file a couple of
times recent
Is https://www.clamav.net/downloads/production/clamav-0.101.5.tar.gz.sig
incorrect. Normally it contains a PGP signature like the 0.101.4 file:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAABAgAGBQJdXCszAAoJEPE/nha8pb+tAjsP/RsKRXprSsubOacVYYaz5ItZ
psOcDrqf+u7K+fWKx9lQzIEfyeD6BcH75WRU+juPvuWCkEV
On 12/08/2019 19:16, J.R. via clamav-users wrote:
I would suggest not packaging them at all, and they
should be downloaded from the update servers the
first time the update is ran.
Ideally yes, I would agree.
However then you run into the edge-case of what if the machine has no
(or very limi
Then you can't start clamd on installation?
On 12/08/2019 15:06, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users wrote:
I would suggest not packaging them at all, and they should be downloaded from
the update servers the first time the update is ran.
On Aug 12, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Nick Howitt wrote
On 12/08/2019 13:25, J.R. via clamav-users wrote:
main.cvd rarely changes (last update was Jan 2018), it is only when
the daily gets so large they push a bunch of signatures over. Bytecode
also does not get updated very often. Really the only things are daily
& safebrowsing (if enabled) that chan
Hi,
I am currently trying to help with packaging ClamAV for ClearOS, based
on the EPEL and FC repos. One thing I have noticed is that they
pre-package virus signatures which both makes the package large and the
signatures are necessarily out of date as soon as they are packaged.
As clamd won'
15 matches
Mail list logo
