[Clamav-users] freshclam can not start

2004-03-09 Thread Muhamad Soleh Fajari
Hi .. When I give command "freschclam" to system, it can not start and what was showed in screen just like theese : bash-2.05# freshclam ClamAV update process started at Wed Mar 10 09:09:52 2004 SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES I know that digital signatures warning is about G

[Clamav-users] clamuko: corrupt ?

2004-03-04 Thread Muhamad Soleh Fajari
Hi.. I was use solaris 9, perl 5.8.0, qmail-scanner-1.20 and clamav-0.67 I'm not sure this is qmail-scanner problem or clamav problem. When I test qmail-scanner I got these errors : bash-2.05# ./contrib/test_installation.sh -doit setting QMAILQUEUE to /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl for thi

[Clamav-users] clamuko ?

2004-02-19 Thread Muhamad Soleh Fajari
What is clamuko ? I was search in clamav website and it just give me short explanation. "Clamuko is a special thread in clamd that performs on-access scanning under Linux" (http://clamav.elektrapro.com/doc/html/node17.html) is this tools only for linux ?? because I am using solaris, and it give me

Re: [Clamav-users] Solaris 9 & clamav

2004-02-17 Thread Muhamad Soleh Fajari
> Muhamad Soleh Fajari wrote: > >> I was install clamav on solaris 9, >> >> ld.so.1: /usr/local/bin/freshclam: fatal: >> /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 >> Killed >> > Yeah. I seem to remember something like that. > W

[Clamav-users] Solaris 9 & clamav

2004-02-17 Thread Muhamad Soleh Fajari
Hi, I was install clamav on solaris 9, and my installation based on http://www.clamav.or.id. But I got truble after running /usr/local/bin/freshclam command : ld.so.1: /usr/local/bin/freshclam: fatal: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 Killed I was install libgcc (SMClibgcc)

Re: [Clamav-users] SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES

2004-02-15 Thread Muhamad Soleh Fajari
how about if I am not install GMP ?, must i install gmp ? what's the impact if i'm not install it ? Peter Bonivart wrote: > Mário Luis Ghoneim wrote: >> What does it means? > > It means it can't check the digital signatures. It downloads the > updates anyway but you can't be sure they have not bee