[Clamav-users] Clamd server connections staying in LAST_ACK state on linux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jay Deiman wrote: > This has been submitted as bug 1567: > https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1567 > > So, I have been working the above bug now for a while and the latest scenario involved me setting up a linux box so I

Re: [Clamav-users] major memory leak in 0.95(.1)

This has been submitted as bug 1567: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1567 -- Jay Deiman \033:wq! ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Re: [Clamav-users] major memory leak in 0.95(.1)

Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-04-13 22:25, Jay Deiman wrote: >> Török Edvin wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >> >>>> Well, *I* couldn't find much of any use in the ktrace output. However, >>>> if someone else would like to take a look at

Re: [Clamav-users] major memory leak in 0.95(.1)

posted the trace file). I have posted the full text output of the kdump as well to make things easy on those not using FreeBSD. That is at: http://janus.splitstreams.com/clamav-kdump.txt.bz2 -- Jay Deiman \033:wq! ___ Help us build a comprehensive

Re: [Clamav-users] major memory leak in 0.95(.1)

Jay Deiman wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: [snip] >> Does it get killed by a signal, or does it exit due to 'ExitOnOOM yes' >> in clamd.conf? >> malloc should return NULL when out of memory, and ClamAV should be able >> to handle it without crashing, if not its

Re: [Clamav-users] major memory leak in 0.95(.1)

Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-04-10 18:04, Jay Deiman wrote: >> I have noticed a serious problem with the latest stable branch of >> clamav, at least on FreeBSD. There seems to be a large scale memory >> leak. Starting with 0.92, I have been running a 10 machine clamd &

[Clamav-users] major memory leak in 0.95(.1)

this is something related specific to FreeBSD or, if it's the massive load we put on this cluster (these 10 machines together process approximately 65 million emails per day) that allows us to see this clearly, but it is quite clear to us. If there is any more info I can supply, I will do

Re: [Clamav-users] Submit phishing emails

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nigel Horne wrote: >> I work for an ISP and I frequently catch phishing emails on our outbound >> mail servers (that are not caught by clamav-milter running on these >> machines). Should phishing emails be submitted on the same form as the >> virus su

[Clamav-users] Submit phishing emails

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I work for an ISP and I frequently catch phishing emails on our outbound mail servers (that are not caught by clamav-milter running on these machines). Should phishing emails be submitted on the same form as the virus submission page (http

Re: [Clamav-users] Odd log messages with clamav-milter 0.92

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jay Deiman wrote: > I'm seeing a ton of the following in /var/log/messages when using > clamav-milter 0.92: > > clamav-01: Operation not permitted > connect: Operation not permitted > clamav-01: Operation not permitted &

[Clamav-users] Odd log messages with clamav-milter 0.92

that I'm seeing, especially because they are completely ambiguous as to what the problem exactly is. Has anyone else run into this since the upgrade to 0.92? Jay Deiman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http:/