scanners, but relying on
users usually leads ... ;-)
--
Jacek Politowski
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
alling into malware category, would be accepted.
Referenced RFC2142 does not state that one _must_ accept _any_ mail
sent to such addresses.
--
Jacek Politowski
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:33:37PM -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote:
>What are the chances of getting new version announcements to the 'users'
>list also? It seems easy and would save a lot of people the trouble of
>subscribing to "yet another list".
And what's
194/cn/nic/rtl8139abcd8130810xseries/win-rtlnic(621).zip
Should they be submitted as false positives?
--
Jacek Politowski
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 12:36:06PM +0100, Trog wrote:
>On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:32, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 at 19:14:04 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>>> We have one client, who was trying to send some MS Word (doc) file
>>> from Outlook Express
from our client, so I
only want to verify if it's possible to have MS Word file infected by
SomeFool.P.
--
Jacek Politowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
