Hello,
A clamscan running from Linux on a Windows disk (mounted on /mnt )
produced the following results:
/mnt/Windows/System32/user32.dll: Win.Exploit.CVE_2017_8689-6336853-0 FOUND
/mnt/Windows/SysWOW64/user32.dll: Win.Exploit.CVE_2017_8689-6336853-0 FOUND
There were other occurrences of the s
i was going to do the report as you suggested but someone else seems to
have beaten me to it. Clamscan on VirusTotal now reports it as clean as
does my local instance of clamscan and dnsapi.dll.
- JD -
Às 19:30 de 17-02-2016, Al Varnell escreveu:
> Then you need to report that as a Fa
o, I'd appreciate some advice on whether I'd likely be OK with
> proceeding to connect to the Internet with the already installed Windows
> 10 and said Panda Antivirus to be installed prior to connecting to the
> Internet.
> Also, if there is anything I might help with (as far
On Wed, 7/22/15, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] How to clean infection by
Docx.Exploit.CVE_2015_1770
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2015, 5:45 PM
Hi there,
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, JD Ackle wrote
On Wed, 7/22/15, Noel Jones wrote:
I would suspect a false positive if a MS Office
document virus is
reported in anything other
than an MS Office document.
Thank you for the reply, Noel.
Should I submit the concerrning files to the False Posit
to know how can I remove
Docx.Exploit.CVE_2015_1770 from Windows/System32/config/SOFTWARE (any
particular key or value I should be looking for?), so that I'm sure it's not
its loading into RAM at startup that's making its signature appear on
/pageFile.sys.
Thanks in advance,
JD Ackle
On 09/09/2010 01:32 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:13:03 -0700
JD articulated:
On 09/09/2010 05:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood articulated:
I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
to be from a bank. I know
On 09/09/2010 05:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood articulated:
I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
to be from a bank. I know too much about email, and about banks.
I reject mail which uses the word 'bank' anywhere in t
On 07/06/2010 05:57 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 7/6/10 5:31 PM, JD wrote:
On 07/06/2010 05:00 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
clamconf |grep TemporaryDir
$ clamconf |grep TemporaryDir
TemporaryDirectory = "/var/tmp"
TemporaryDirectory disabled
Is that what's causing it? The d
On 07/06/2010 05:00 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
clamconf |grep TemporaryDir
$ clamconf |grep TemporaryDir
TemporaryDirectory = "/var/tmp"
TemporaryDirectory disabled
Is that what's causing it? The disabled setting?
Where do I enable it?
___
Help us b
I ran:
$ sudo clamdscan -l /tmp/clamdscan.log /sda1
/sda1 is the mount point for my windows partition.
I got tons of error mssages like this one:
/sda1/WINDOWS/Installer/265ad74.msp: Can't create temporary directory ERROR
In what directory is clamdscan trying to create a temp dir ??
__
On 07/06/2010 01:35 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Jul 6, 2010, at 12:32 PM, JD wrote:
For example, the packages installed from the build
failed to create user clamupdate, which freshclam needs.
That username isn't the default one which the clamav sources assume, namely:
# By default
On 07/06/2010 01:58 PM, Jim Preston wrote:
On Jul 6, 2010, at 12:32 PM, JD wrote:
On 07/06/2010 11:28 AM, Daniel McDonald wrote:
On 7/6/10 12:53 PM, "JD" wrote:
On 07/06/2010 10:28 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 07/06/2010 09:38 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi, JD--
So,
On 07/06/2010 01:08 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 07/06/2010 10:28 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 07/06/2010 09:38 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi, JD--
So, the fedora distro people screwed up by setting it to level 44 in the
source code?
Is it possible you installed only a clam client
On 07/06/2010 11:28 AM, Daniel McDonald wrote:
On 7/6/10 12:53 PM, "JD" wrote:
On 07/06/2010 10:28 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 07/06/2010 09:38 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi, JD--
So, the fedora distro people screwed up by setting it to level 44 in the
source code?
Is i
On 07/06/2010 10:28 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 07/06/2010 09:38 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi, JD--
So, the fedora distro people screwed up by setting it to level 44 in the
source code?
Is it possible you installed only a clam client and not the full suite?
You must not have read this
On 07/06/2010 09:38 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi, JD--
On Jul 6, 2010, at 9:19 AM, JD wrote:
WARNING: Current functionality level = 44, recommended = 53
DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq
I read the FAQ and it does not tell me where this setting is set.
It
start/stop script for it in /etc/init.d ?? so that it can be
managed by
the system services?
How about providing a default clamd.conf in either /etc or
/etc/sysconfig ???
Best regards,
JD
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV gui
18 matches
Mail list logo
