On 7/19/2011 4:02 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> In my opinion, if twitter is a requirement for using ClamAV then
> this project is doomed. I don't see our 'business' endorsing our NOC
> playing with twitter as part of the job.
There is ZERO chance of that getting allowed here. If this becomes a
Tomasz:
As requested -
RHEL4
==
./configure && make check
configure: Summary of detected features follows
OS : linux-gnu
pthreads: yes (-lpthread)
configure: Summary of miscellaneous features
check : no (auto)
clam
is received in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
message.
From:
Török Edwin
To:
ClamAV users ML
Cc:
george_kas...@mgic.com
Date:
09/22/2010 11:23
Subject:
Re: [Clamav-users] What ever happened to the Release Candidate for
0.96.3??
Sent by:
clamav-users-boun...@
.96.3??
Sent by:
clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:56:18 -0500
George Kasica wrote:
> All I can ask after messing with 50+ boxes here to get 0.96.3 running
> is hat ever happened to the RELEASE CANDIDATE for 0.96.3it would
> have sure helped to see tha
the Release Candidate for
0.96.3??
Sent by:
clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:56:18 -0500 George Kasica
wrote:
> All I can ask after messing with 50+ boxes here to get 0.96.3 running is
> hat ever happened to the RELEASE CANDIDATE for 0.96.3it would
me any day of the week. They could
code
circles around me, but so far they won't. what does that tell you?
--
Sincerely,
Nathan Gibbs
Systems Administrator
Christ Media
http://www.cmpublishers.com
[attachment "signature.asc"
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2225
___
George R. Kasica | Systems Analyst – Technical Services | Mortgage
Guaranty Insurance Corporation
270 E. Kilbourn Ave. | Milwaukee, WI 53202 USA | ( 1.414.347.6491(work)
1.414.732.8503 (cell) | 7 1.888.
