his expected behaviour for clamscan?
- Is there another, lower, limit on file sizes which can actually be scanned in
practice?
- Is there a way to force clamscan to error if a file has not actually been
scanned?
Regards,
Gareth
___
clamav-us
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni <
giampa...@tomassoni.biz> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just for interest.. feedback on EOL...
> >
> > http://search.twitter.com/search?q=clamav
>
> Indeed, an EOL on the previous minor version is quite an hazard and may be
> regarded as a self-destru
Today we seen it happen thrice randomly within three hours and once 3 weeks
ago
On Monday 10 December 2007 01:26:22 pm Trog wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 13:06 +0200, Gareth Koopman wrote:
> > Hope this helps...
> >
> > [ophelia:~]# cat /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory
>
Hope this helps...
[ophelia:~]# cat /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory
0
On Monday 10 December 2007 12:21:13 pm Trog wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 11:29 +0200, Gareth Koopman wrote:
> > Good Morning
> >
> > I am currently running clamav 0.91.2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS
>
2007-12-10 10:59:01.222556500 ERROR: pthread_create failed
2007-12-10 10:59:05.708102500 /var/spool/eric/mail6203:
Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain FOUND
Gareth
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http
The solution worked thank you very much. We also found that there are two
copies of the virus database being loaded
Gareth
On Monday, 7 May 2007, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> Hello, Gareth.
>
> You wrote on Monday, May 7, 2007, 11:26:16 AM:
> > I am running clamav with qmail on Red
Good Morning
I am running clamav with qmail on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 and i
have recently upgraded to clamav-0.90.2. Clamd's cpu usage shotup to an
average between 400% and 500%(8 cpu's), even though the amount of virusses
did'nt increase that much.
Any ideas?
__
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 20:28, IT Purchases wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm constructing a SPAM / AV mechanism to reduce the incoming debris.
>
> I'm using Postfix with amavisd-new, Clam-AV and SpamAssassin.
>
> What is the easiest way to setup a whitelist for Clam-AV?
Why would you ever want to whitelis
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
> > You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
> > to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
>
> Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
>
> "Hi, you got a mail from
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 13:00, Gareth Blades wrote:
> I am running Suse Openexchange -> Amavis (clamd) -> Postfix.
>
> Mine lets through 24, 25, 27.
> Number 8 was blocked by file type but not detected by a virus.
> For 24 & 25 as they are not a virus I need to look at the
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 12:35, Meni Shapiro wrote:
>
>
> Philip Ershler wrote:
> > I am running the .80 release. Tonight I ran the current set of tests
> > from www.testvirus.org.
> > Tests 4,5,7,8,17, and 19 got through. Any idea what's going on. The last
>
> I'm running v 0.80 and made the te
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 14:32, Gareth Blades wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:47, Lionel Bouton wrote:
> > Gareth Blades wrote the following on 06/29/2004 01:52 PM :
> >
> > >I am running Suse Openexchange 4.1. I have installed
> > >amavisd-postfix-20020531-31 a
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:47, Lionel Bouton wrote:
> Gareth Blades wrote the following on 06/29/2004 01:52 PM :
>
> >I am running Suse Openexchange 4.1. I have installed
> >amavisd-postfix-20020531-31 and by default it is configured to use
> >'H+BEDV AntiVir'
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:54, Graham Dodd wrote:
> Hello Gareth,
>
> Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 1:52:57 PM, you wrote:
>
> GB> I am running Suse Openexchange 4.1. I have installed
> GB> amavisd-postfix-20020531-31 and by default it is configured to use
> GB> '
I am running Suse Openexchange 4.1. I have installed
amavisd-postfix-20020531-31 and by default it is configured to use
'H+BEDV AntiVir' for virus checking.
I have installed clamav-0.73 from source and compiled and installed it
and it is working. I have started clamd and edited /etc/amavisd.conf a
Sorry... I need spoon feeding...
...just remove the files? I didn't do an RPM or Deb package install... and
I've not stumbled across a 'Add/Remove Programs' in the Control Panel yet
;-)
Gareth
Matthew wrote:
> Best bet to remove .65 first
>
> Caused me no end
Hi Guys
What is the best way to upgrade from ClamAV 0.65 to 0.66, should I just
install on top of the current installation, or remove first?
What is good practice?
Gareth
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build
re on my system.
Has anyone got a 'How to' or some other notes on getting this to work on
Debain Woody?
Many thanks
Gareth
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integ
18 matches
Mail list logo
