[clamav-users] Maximize availability during rule loading

2016-11-20 Thread Charles Sprickman
just fail over to the other box. If not, what can be done to maintain availability while the db reloads? I currently reload every hour (based on clamd.conf), occasionally more often if there are new rules detected by clamav-unofficial-sigs. Thanks, Charles -- Charles Sprickman NetEng/SysAdmin

Re: [Clamav-users] ScanStream: accept timeout, unkillable

2007-02-12 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Craig Green wrote: Charles Sprickman wrote: Hi all, I've been having this problem for quite some time and thought it might go away after upgrading all our spamd/clamd boxes to FreeBSD 6.2 from 4.11. It hasn't though... We use a maildrop recipe that uses

[Clamav-users] ScanStream: accept timeout, unkillable

2007-02-05 Thread Charles Sprickman
bols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 [Switching to LWP 100199] 0x28148c6b in pthread_testcancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 (gdb) where #0 0x28148c6b in pthread_testcancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #1 0x28140efa in pthread_mutexattr_init () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #2 0x08057400 in ?? () Thanks, Charl

Re: [Clamav-users] network scanning questions

2004-03-09 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Chris Meadors wrote: > International Center for Alcohol Policies? Now what exactly will the > new version of ClamAV be doing? :) Hopefully it will work well enough that no one will have to modify their drinking habits. > Maybe http://www.i-cap.org/home.html? Has anyone mad

Re: [Clamav-users] network scanning questions

2004-03-09 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 19:37:13 -0500 (EST) > Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm looking at implementing clamav for a somewhat large userbase. Due > > Please defer it for some

[Clamav-users] network scanning questions

2004-03-05 Thread Charles Sprickman
Hello, I'm looking at implementing clamav for a somewhat large userbase. Due to that, I need to run multiple clamds on seperate machines so as not to eat all the resources on the main mail server. Think "spamd/spamc"... >From what I can tell, the client included with clamav does not allow for t