Good morning,
I have local signatures (local.ndb) define.
One of my rules is not allways matched because
the UA or MTA may generate/modify different headers.
I have defined a match on:
application/zip; name="testdu28.zip"
But emails are sometimes generated with:
...application/zip;
name="testd
Good morning,
I opened the Bug 1151 two days ago.
I have opened it as P3/Normal as it is not a blocking bug.
Unfortunately, nobody seems to be interested by it.
As I am not very familiar with clamd bug resolution,
could you please tell me how long it generally takes before
that kind of bug is pro
Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2008-09-01 15:57, Benoit Schmid wrote:
>> Good morning,
>>
>> I have set a filter with "application/zip; name=testxxx.zip".
>> I have a file/email with the following line in it:
>> ...
>> --Boundary_(ID_4GBDup7bX3Z1t
Good morning,
I have set a filter with "application/zip; name=testxxx.zip".
I have a file/email with the following line in it:
...
--Boundary_(ID_4GBDup7bX3Z1tEB0xZDRDQ)
Content-type: application/zip; name=testxxx.zip
...
If I connect to the clamd server and issue the command
SCAN email_with_pa
Paul Bijnens wrote:
> On 2007-05-21 07:26, Benoit Schmid wrote:
>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> When I run a clamscan on a folder containing emails with different viruses.
>> There is an eicar that is not detected.
>>
>> Would you know why?
>>
Rob MacGregor wrote:
> On 5/21/07, Benoit Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> When I run a clamscan on a folder containing emails with different viruses.
>> There is an eicar that is not detected.
>>
>> Would you know why?
Good morning,
When I run a clamscan on a folder containing emails with different viruses.
There is an eicar that is not detected.
Would you know why?
The file start after this line:
t;1179497094
p;3
*;4
u;FILTER_DISCARD
c;tcp_intranet
(;TCP|129.194.9.224|25|129.194.16.24|46422
);SMTP/a
s;a ([129
