On Tue, 14 May 2019 14:53:27 +
Graeme Fowler wrote:
> If you're running a mail server that receives one email per
> day... maybe do that in a different way so you use your resources for
> something else!
I'm not running a mail server. I'm using clamAV at user end scanning
incoming email via
On Mon, 13 May 2019 16:21:15 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> loading takes time, much time.
How much time are we talking about here? I suppose by 'time' we mean
loading time (load binary and signatures) + processing time (comparing
signatures).
Now, for loading time, when I start firefox
On Mon, 13 May 2019 19:30:12 +0530
Avinash Sonawane wrote:
> Single email account here. On average, I receive one email a day.
> Devoting 1Gb memory all the time for that seems a poor bargain.
Why can't clamd let databases/signatures stay in secondary memory
itself. Just load them when you actu
On Mon, 13 May 2019 15:46:42 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 13.05.19 18:53, Avinash Sonawane via clamav-users wrote:
> redusing the number of signatures is the only way I know of.
Actually, I was thinking if I could tweak some clamd conf without
removing AV databases/sign
Hello!
I'm using ClamAV 0.100.3/25448 on Debian Stretch. It's a default
install without any tweaks (as far as I remember).
As seen from the below top o/p, without any active scan clamd is using
~1Gb memory. That's unacceptable. May I know how do I reduce clamd
memory usage?
PID USER PR NI
