On 05.07.2010 / 11:24:22 -0400, Nathan Gibbs wrote:
> > I'd suggest you to try 0.96.1.
> >
> > The oldest I ever tested ClamAV with is gcc 3.4.x, I don't know if
> > 3.2.x would work or not.
>
> I've compiled 0.96.1 with gcc 3.3.3
>
> It runs fine.
>
> As of July last year we had a running clam
opened by Robert
Tana.
Thanks.
On 03.12.2009 / 08:10:30 -0500, Tom Shaw wrote:
> At 3:50 PM +0300 12/3/09, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> >Someone with linkedin account, could be interested in commenting the
> >following discussion
> >http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAn
Someone with linkedin account, could be interested in commenting the
following discussion
http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=10222162&gid=107486
On 24.11.2009 / 15:27:44 -0500, Scott Mohnkern wrote:
> In our particular environment (a government server farm),
Is it possible to put link to the clamav.net site, maybe somewhere under
"download" section and keep URL history for this ChangeLog files ?
On 23.11.2009 / 10:54:02 +0200, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-11-23 10:51, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > is ChangeLog for clamav 0.95.3 ava
On 25.05.2009 / 07:01:05 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
> aCaB wrote:
> > M. Lewis wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will
> > get any sort of compilation errors. Working them around is not trivial BTW.
> >
> > If you can somehow get a gcc 3.x i
Almost same, my freshclam.log complaining about 217.20.175.83 for month
now:
Mon Apr 6 11:28:30 2009 -> Can't connect to port 80 of host
database.clamav.net (IP: 217.20.175.83)
...
Mon Apr 27 07:40:00 2009 -> Can't connect to port 80 of host
database.clamav.net (IP: 217.20.175.83)
On 27.04.20
Hello!
3 days ago compiled clamav-0.95.1 on solaris 10 x86 box.
Connected it to out MTA system through cgpav helper application.
After a few hours, clamd eats 4Gb of system RAM and keep running with
it. Can you please help me to investigate?
Right now I'm running 0.95 version back, and here its
