Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 31.03.22 11:02, Petr Jurášek via clamav-users wrote:
https://www.mail-archive.com/clamav-users@lists.clamav.net/msg51769.html
It's the same situation. Vir is detected, but file is "clean", you can
see it in summary.
looks like that. I completely missed it.
On 31.03.22 11:02, Petr Jurášek via clamav-users wrote:
https://www.mail-archive.com/clamav-users@lists.clamav.net/msg51769.html
It's the same situation. Vir is detected, but file is "clean", you
can see it in summary.
On 31.03.22 12:18, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
looks like that. I compl
Hi,
yes, same version:
# clamscan --version
ClamAV 0.103.5/26498/Thu Mar 31 10:19:05 2022
# clamdscan --version
ClamAV 0.103.5/26498/Thu Mar 31 10:19:05 2022
But file isn't detected by clamscan - both (clamscan/clamdscan) reports,
that file is clean. Only clamscan write some debug with virus de
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Hello,
I have received a file that is not detected by clamdscan, but is by clamscan:
% clamdscan /home/uhlar/intamldeosreitlu.xls
/home/uhlar/intamldeosreitlu.xls: OK
% clamscan /home/uhlar/intamldeosreitlu.xls
/home/uhlar/intamldeosreitlu.
On 31.03.22 11:02, Petr Jurášek via clamav-users wrote:
https://www.mail-archive.com/clamav-users@lists.clamav.net/msg51769.html
It's the same situation. Vir is detected, but file is "clean", you can
see it in summary.
looks like that. I completely missed it.
% clamscan intamldeosreitlu.xls
Hi,
https://www.mail-archive.com/clamav-users@lists.clamav.net/msg51769.html
It's the same situation. Vir is detected, but file is "clean", you can
see it in summary.
S pozdravem
Petr Jurášek
Dne 31. 03. 22 v 10:55 Matus UHLAR - fantomas napsal(a):
Hello,
I have received a file that is not
Hello,
I have received a file that is not detected by clamdscan, but is by
clamscan:
% clamdscan /home/uhlar/intamldeosreitlu.xls
/home/uhlar/intamldeosreitlu.xls: OK
% clamscan /home/uhlar/intamldeosreitlu.xls
/home/uhlar/intamldeosreitlu.xls: Doc.Downloader.Qbot03222-9942295-0 FOUND
/home/u
