Re: [clamav-users] Long Term Support (LTS) program proposal

2021-07-30 Thread Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users
> On Jul 30, 2021, at 14:41, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users > wrote: > > (I don't see exactly how a LTS would have helped with the bandwidth issue, > but I suppose it wouldn't have made it any more disruptive.) 103.2 and 103.3 are much more respectful to bandwidth than any past version. We

Re: [clamav-users] Long Term Support (LTS) program proposal

2021-07-30 Thread Arjen de Korte via clamav-users
Citeren Paul Kosinski via clamav-users : LTS sounds like a great idea! Recently, the bandwidth hogging episodes have resulted in rapid changes to ClamAV versions, followed by EOL of versions that many people (not including me) were still using. So recently I have had to spend far more tim

Re: [clamav-users] [OT] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.104.0 Release Candidate is here!

2021-07-30 Thread Paul Kosinski via clamav-users
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:33:02 +0100 (BST) "G.W. Haywood via clamav-users" wrote: > Hi there, > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2021, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: > > > ... do any firewall distros address inter-LAN filtering? > > We're well off-topic here so I think we should stop this now, but I >

Re: [clamav-users] Long Term Support (LTS) program proposal

2021-07-30 Thread Paul Kosinski via clamav-users
LTS sounds like a great idea! Recently, the bandwidth hogging episodes have resulted in rapid changes to ClamAV versions, followed by EOL of versions that many people (not including me) were still using. So recently I have had to spend far more time on updating ClamAV than updating anything els

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.104.0 Release Candidate with CMake required!

2021-07-30 Thread John Capo via clamav-users
Builds on Freebsd 12.x after building and installing libcheck from github. Its running on a spamtrap machine handling > 2000 messages daily. John Capo On 2021-07-29 03:09, Avram-Teodor Berindeie wrote: ClamAV 0.104.0 Release Candidate has been compiled without any problems and works properly

[clamav-users] PATCH[2]: Re: ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.104.0 Release Candidate is here!

2021-07-30 Thread Mark Fortescue via clamav-users
Hi Micah, Please find attached patch #2 to clean up patch #1 'if' statements and fix some other issues fond (mostly documentation). The outstanding variable is LIBCLAMAV_LIBS. It is used by clamav-config.in and libclamav.pc.in. Not sure about the logic required for this one. On my OS, it is

Re: [clamav-users] can't cmake 1.0.4rc

2021-07-30 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021, Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote: Well, I've screwed around with this for 3 days now, that's long enough. First gotcha for debian people is cmake is not installed, and when installed, it is NOT installed in a directory accessible to the user with a default $PATH, so the

Re: [clamav-users] can't cmake 1.0.4rc

2021-07-30 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote: I see by synaptic, that both python-test and python3-test are available. Which is preferred? I'd assume python3-test in order to future proof, but assumptions are where we've gone aglay too many times already. My experience on fast-trac

Re: [clamav-users] can't cmake 1.0.4rc

2021-07-30 Thread Gene Heskett via clamav-users
On Friday 30 July 2021 03:32:44 Arjen de Korte via clamav-users wrote: > Citeren Gene Heskett via clamav-users : > > Well, I've screwed around with this for 3 days now, that's long > > enough. > > > > First gotcha for debian people is cmake is not installed, and when > > installed, it is NOT insta

Re: [clamav-users] can't cmake 1.0.4rc

2021-07-30 Thread Arjen de Korte via clamav-users
Citeren Gene Heskett via clamav-users : Well, I've screwed around with this for 3 days now, that's long enough. First gotcha for debian people is cmake is not installed, and when installed, it is NOT installed in a directory accessible to the user with a default $PATH, so the first thing I have