On Oct 1, 2019, at 10:29 AM, J.R. via clamav-users
mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>> wrote:
ClamAV isn't responsible for maintaining spec files, those are
DISTRO-SPECIFIC... Imagine if they were supposed to maintain packages
for every distro out there... That would basically bring developm
> I think you misunderstand me, I'm merely stating a fact here.
> Epel won't do anything about libcurl, and redhat won't just backport new
> features "because of". Even so, backport requests take a long time at redhat.
> Maybe the epel guys will include a static version of libcurl for clamav, I
>
