Not so much old as hodge podge. But yes that seems to be similar and does
recommend that the make should check for a zlib minimum version.
Regards,
KAM
On April 18, 2019 3:37:25 PM EDT, "J.R. via clamav-users"
wrote:
>> Just an FYI thatclamav was linking to libz.so.1.1.4 and upgrading to
>> li
> Just an FYI thatclamav was linking to libz.so.1.1.4 and upgrading to
> libz.so.1.2.11 resolved the issue with being unable to verify updates.
>
> Might need to be a check for a minimum zlip version though I don't have
> input which version specifically demonstrates the issue.
zlib 1.1.4 ??? How
Hi All,
I have installed latest version of ClamAV which is 0.101.2 version,but i
was still facing the clamav un-Authenticated Command Exception Vulnerablity.
Could anyone help if there is any specific patch to apply to address this
issue?
Thanks,
M
__
Mark, Kevin,
I’m glad to hear that your load and scan times are back down to reasonable
levels.
We’ll continue to investigate the best, safest way to add the phishing
detection in a way that is fast and optional.
Regards,
Micah
From: clamav-users on behalf of Mark
Allan via clamav-users
Re
Fantastic! I can also confirm that scan times are back to normal now -
more-or-less back to what they were in early February.
The time for one of our FP test volumes which I've been referencing in this
thread is back down to 3m 30s, and the total time for our *full* FP test is
back down from sever
Looks like all Phish.Phishing.REPHISH_ID_... signatures were dropped by
daily-25423 today.
-Al-
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 04:02, Al Varnell wrote:
>
> There are still 2515 "Phish.Phishing.REPHISH_ID_" signatures in daily.ldb
>
> -Al-
>
>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 03:36, Maarten Broekman >