Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.100.1 - clamd signal 11, leaves unix domain socket behind?

2018-09-25 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Micah Snyder wrote: ... as it is written now, it loads over 500MB worth of signature database content into RAM and then forks, temporarily resulting in over 1000MB of ram consumed until the parent process exits. ... Won't they share the memory (on a sane OS)? -

[clamav-users] I've just uploaded 6 false positives for 'Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain'

2018-09-25 Thread Walter H.
Hello, these are all true Mails that came from Paypal.at and were stored in an extra folder of mail filtering box; Thanks in advance Greeting, Walter ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/l

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.100.1 - clamd signal 11, leaves unix domain socket behind?

2018-09-25 Thread Karl Pielorz
--On 24 September 2018 11:31 +0100 Mark Fortescue wrote: Hi Micah, Can you not have a two part demon process. Part one fork's the real demon and then waits for it to die (with 'wait()'). On death of the child, it cleans up and exits. Yes I know it is not quite as simple as that. It will h

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.100.1 - clamd signal 11, leaves unix domain socket behind?

2018-09-25 Thread Karl Pielorz
--On 21 September 2018 17:14 +0100 "G.W. Haywood" wrote: Hi there, On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Karl Pielorz wrote: ... it gets delivered if it fails during the scan ... It doesn't have to be that way, and if someone knows a way to stop clamd then maybe they could use it to get past your defe