Re: [clamav-users] WARNING: Local version: 0.99.4 Recommended version: 0.100.0

2018-06-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.06.2018 um 02:06 schrieb Philip: > Has this been released yet by the major Distros? I'm using Debian 9 and > can't get any higher than 0.99.x debian don't raise numbers normally, Fedora does and since EPEL is a Fedora maintained repo it does too clamav-0.100.0-2.fc27.x86_64 clamav-data-e

Re: [clamav-users] WARNING: Local version: 0.99.4 Recommended version: 0.100.0

2018-06-20 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
Timeless, on #clamav (irc), pointed out that for Fedora they only needs one more +1 karma to get it out for epel6 folks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-88c0c447a4 Someone could do the test to help get it bumped out of bodhi. It's pretty simple: create an account, inst

Re: [clamav-users] clamav list spf problem

2018-06-20 Thread Andrew McGlashan
Hi, On 21/06/18 02:51, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Thursday, June 21, 2018 02:38:45 AM Andrew McGlashan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 21/06/18 00:46, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: >>> Our operations group in Talos has updated the SPF record for >>> lists.clamav.net to account f

Re: [clamav-users] clamav list spf problem

2018-06-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, June 21, 2018 02:38:45 AM Andrew McGlashan wrote: > Hi, > > On 21/06/18 00:46, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: > > Our operations group in Talos has updated the SPF record for > > lists.clamav.net to account for the issue w/ > > Cisco's SPF records. In additi

Re: [clamav-users] clamav list spf problem

2018-06-20 Thread Andrew McGlashan
Hi, On 21/06/18 00:46, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: > Our operations group in Talos has updated the SPF record for > lists.clamav.net to account for the issue w/ > Cisco's SPF records.  In addition, I believe they're also working on > fixing the cisco.com

Re: [clamav-users] clamav list spf problem

2018-06-20 Thread Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
Our operations group in Talos has updated the SPF record for lists.clamav.net to account for the issue w/ Cisco's SPF records. In addition, I believe they're also working on fixing the cisco.com / sco.cisco.com SPF records but it

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] Re: WARNING: Local version: 0.99.4 Recommended version: 0.100.0

2018-06-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
On June 20, 2018 8:38:50 AM UTC, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >* Philip : >> Has this been released yet by the major Distros? I'm using Debian 9 >and >> can't get any higher than 0.99.x > >Debian has 0.100: >https://packages.debian.org/buster/clamav > >I used that source package to rebuild for my U

[clamav-users] LibClamAV Warning: Bytcode 73 failed to run: Time limit reached

2018-06-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
The last nightly ClamAV scan on one of my machines emitted a series of error messages I'm not familiar with: LibClamAV Warning: [Bytecode JIT]: Bytecode run timed out, timeout flag set LibClamAV Warning: [Bytecode JIT]: recovered from error LibClamAV Warning: [Bytecode JIT]: JITed code intercepted

Re: [clamav-users] [ext] Re: WARNING: Local version: 0.99.4 Recommended version: 0.100.0

2018-06-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Philip : > Has this been released yet by the major Distros? I'm using Debian 9 and > can't get any higher than 0.99.x Debian has 0.100: https://packages.debian.org/buster/clamav I used that source package to rebuild for my Ubuntu installaions. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Charite Univ