On Dec 24, 2014, at 6:09 AM, Arnaud Jacques / SecuriteInfo.com
wrote:
>
> Public information, but private usage.
> I believe in this philosophy : https://www.eff.org/encrypt-the-web
>
>> Secondarily, https creates a greater
>> server load to encrypt the data,
>
> With nowadays CPUs, that's n
Ah - thanks for putting me right.
Best, Nele
On 24-12-2014 18:45, Shawn Webb wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Nele Ysebaert wrote:
Hi there (second posting),
Trying to download the latest version of Clamwin, I just ended up in a
loop. It didn't work: on hitting the download button,
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Nele Ysebaert wrote:
> Hi there (second posting),
>
> Trying to download the latest version of Clamwin, I just ended up in a
> loop. It didn't work: on hitting the download button, I saw a countdown
> screen, but after that I was just redirected to the former sc
Hi there (second posting),
Trying to download the latest version of Clamwin, I just ended up in a
loop. It didn't work: on hitting the download button, I saw a countdown
screen, but after that I was just redirected to the former screen with
the download button and nothing ever happened, no matte
Hi there,
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014, Arnaud Jacques / SecuriteInfo.com wrote:
Le mardi 23 d?cembre 2014, 10:56:37 Dennis Peterson a ?crit :
What problem are you trying to solve with https?
Privacy.
Then use Tor. I have no privacy problem.
This is my opinion.
If there's spare effort availab
On 24/12/2014 11:09, Arnaud Jacques / SecuriteInfo.com wrote:
What problem are you trying to solve with https?
Privacy.
The data contain no secrets
and are freely available to any who wish to have it, so the immediate
effect of encryption is unneeded.
Public information, but private usage.
Le mardi 23 décembre 2014, 10:56:37 Dennis Peterson a écrit :
> Second try:
>
> What problem are you trying to solve with https?
Privacy.
> The data contain no secrets
> and are freely available to any who wish to have it, so the immediate
> effect of encryption is unneeded.
Public information