So you’ve tried the beta and it didn’t fix the issue? One of the reasons for
announcing the beta was so folks like you can play in the bug fixing process.
There are dozens of changes to each version and only a few of the major items
are ever mentioned in the announcements. There are far too ma
It's been two mondays now and no news... a new beta is posted but nothing
about the issue is mentioned?
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:52:47PM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote:
> Hey Paul,
>
> The reason for that is likely due to my usage of ctors and dtors with
> 0.98.3. In that version, I had added a ctor
ClamAV 0.98.5 beta has been posted!
The ClamAV team is proud to announce the availability of ClamAV 0.98.5 beta
ready for testing!
http://blog.clamav.net/2014/07/clamav-0985-beta-has-been-posted.html
--
Joel Esler
Open Source Manager
Threat Intelligence Team Lead
Vulnerability Research Team
___
El 04/07/14 18:22, Greg Folkert escribió:
FYI, CentOSv4 Support Ended Feb 2012. It is over 2 years out of date. The
newest I've been able to get to work is 0.98.1 with Stock Stuff.
Install/Compile a newer version of OpenSSL in /usr/local/openssl-(version)/
and point your ClamAV compile towards i
I guess, if you *really* wanted to block mp3's being emailed you could
create a type4 ndb signature to match the mp3 base64 in the email ?
eg... email format...
==
Content-Type: audio/mpeg;
name="test.mp3"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
On Tue, July 8, 2014 3:41 pm, a...@alb.de wrote:
> alex:~$ dd if=mp3file.mp3 count=1 | sigtool --hex-dump
> alex:~$ clamscan mp3file.exe
Hi Alex,
In the daily.ftm file, mp3 filetypes are ignored.
0:0:494433:MP3:CL_TYPE_ANY:CL_TYPE_IGNORED
Cheers,
Steve
Sanesecurity
Hello,
I'm trying to create signatures for clamav, to detect exe and mp3
files. Seems to work for exe, but strangely not for mp3, despite
the fact I did excatly the same in both cases:
Getting signatures for both files:
alex:~$ dd if=exefile.exe count=1 | sigtool --hex-dum
1+0 Datensätze ein
1+
> On Jul 8, 2014, at 5:11, "DUCARROZ Birgit" wrote:
>
> Platform: You mean the platform where clamav is installed, not the platform
> the virus is for, just?
Yes. The platform where ClamAV is.
> What do you mean I must attach with "raw message"? The output of the
> virus-scan? Or the file
Hi Alain,
Just some questions about the form:
Platform: You mean the platform where clamav is installed, not the
platform the virus is for, just?
What do you mean I must attach with "raw message"? The output of the
virus-scan? Or the file containing the virus (or false positive)?
- Birgit
O
