Re: [clamav-users] Clamav 0.98.3 on RHEL4 - OpenSSL problem

-- Pozdrawiam, Dariusz Wojciechowski FABA S.A. W dniu 2014-05-16 15:06, Shawn Webb pisze: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Dariusz Wojciechowski wrote: Hello. I try to compile Clamav 0.98.3 on my quite old server with Red Hat EL 4. I can't just remove my current OpenSSL from my box due to t

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV®: ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

> - Crashes of clamd on Windows and Mac OS X platforms when reloading > the virus signature database. Just testing at the moment - reload issue seems to have gone and so far so good... great work guys! Cheers, Steve Sanesecurity ___ Help us build a

Re: [clamav-users] Compiling error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so: error adding symbols: File in wrong format

Sadly, the libxml2-error still persists in v0.98.4-rc1. Hope, it can be fixed soon. Regards Alexander Am 14.05.2014 01:19, schrieb MarkusGMX: Am 08/05/14 22:52, schrieb Alexander Tampermeier: Dave, thank you for your detailed response. First, I tried to configure with option "--disable-xml"

Re: [clamav-users] reported before, makes no sense

Gene Heskett skrev den 2014-05-16 08:03: On Friday 16 May 2014 00:59:44 Al Varnell did opine And Gene did reply: UNOFFICIAL means it did not come from ClamAV® Now what? Shut down my daily scan? clamconf | grep -i database make sure this dir does not contain unofficial sigs not possible t

Re: [clamav-users] reported before, makes no sense

Gene Heskett skrev den 2014-05-16 06:38: Can we please get this FP removed? 3dr party sigs does not make sense to blame on clamav maillist ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/su

Re: [clamav-users] reported before, makes no sense

On 5/16/2014 9:52 AM, Kris Deugau wrote: Bowie Bailey wrote: I highly recommend the Sanesecurity signatures. They catch much more than the stock signatures. They also catch spam, scam, phishing, and other misc junk emails. I haven't had any problems with false positives. Here's the breakdown

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV®: ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

On Friday, May 16, 2014 16:08:56 Martin Preen wrote: > Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > > http://blog.clamav.net/2014/05/clamav-0984rc1-is-now-available.html > > > > ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available for download. Shown below are the notes > > concerning this release: > > > > 0.98.4rc1 > > -- >

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV®: ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: http://blog.clamav.net/2014/05/clamav-0984rc1-is-now-available.html ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available for download. Shown below are the notes concerning this release: 0.98.4rc1 -- ClamAV 0.98.4 is a bug fix release. The following issues are now resolved: - Var

Re: [clamav-users] reported before, makes no sense

Bowie Bailey wrote: > I highly recommend the Sanesecurity signatures. They catch much more > than the stock signatures. They also catch spam, scam, phishing, and > other misc junk emails. I haven't had any problems with false positives. > > Here's the breakdown from my recent logs: > > 818 Tot

Re: [clamav-users] reported before, makes no sense

On 5/16/2014 6:39 AM, Steve Basford wrote: -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav adm 5958972 2013-05-03 07:51 junk.ndb That's a bit out of date ;) -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav adm 567741 2013-05-04 01:48 mbl.ndb JUST NUKED I'll see if the one I just nuked comes back. Yep, that'll be the one to watch out for.

Re: [clamav-users] Version 0.98.3 fails on Solaris

On May 13, 2014, at 4:24 AM, Al Varnell mailto:alvarn...@mac.com>> wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:04 AM, James Lee wrote: (Please don't top post.) Please leave moderation functions to the moderators. There could possibly be a rule preventing it, but I’m unaware of any and there are example

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav 0.98.3 on RHEL4 - OpenSSL problem

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Dariusz Wojciechowski wrote: > Hello. > > I try to compile Clamav 0.98.3 on my quite old server with Red Hat EL 4. I > guess I have the same issue as Gary on his Mac OSX 10.5.8: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.virus.clamav.user/39771 > > I mean to

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav 0.98.3 on RHEL4 - OpenSSL problem

> configure:16632: checking for SSL_library_init in -lssl > configure:16657: gcc -o conftest -I/usr/local/ssl/include > -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto conftest.c -lssl -ldl >&5 > /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.a(ssl_algs.o)(.text+0x4): In function > `SSL_library_init': > : undefined reference to

[clamav-users] ClamAV®: ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

http://blog.clamav.net/2014/05/clamav-0984rc1-is-now-available.html ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available for download. Shown below are the notes concerning this release: 0.98.4rc1 -- ClamAV 0.98.4 is a bug fix release. The following issues are now resolved: - Various build problems on Solar

[clamav-users] Clamav 0.98.3 on RHEL4 - OpenSSL problem

Hello. I try to compile Clamav 0.98.3 on my quite old server with Red Hat EL 4. I guess I have the same issue as Gary on his Mac OSX 10.5.8: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.virus.clamav.user/39771 I mean too old version of OpenSSL. Configure works fine, but on make I get: crypto.

Re: [clamav-users] reported before, makes no sense

>-rw-r--r-- 1 clamav adm 5958972 2013-05-03 07:51 junk.ndb That's a bit out of date ;) > -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav adm 567741 2013-05-04 01:48 mbl.ndb JUST NUKED > I'll see if the one I just nuked comes back. Yep, that'll be the one to watch out for... Current download scripts are here,

Re: [clamav-users] reported before, makes no sense

On Friday 16 May 2014 02:37:08 Steve Basford did opine And Gene did reply: > >> UNOFFICIAL means it did not come from ClamAV®. > >> You need to take it up with whomever maintains the MBL database. > >> MalwarePatrol? > > > > I don't recall every subscribing to that s

Re: [clamav-users] reported before, makes no sense

On Friday 16 May 2014 02:36:28 Greg Folkert did opine And Gene did reply: > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 02:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Friday 16 May 2014 00:59:44 Al Varnell did opine > > > > And Gene did reply: > > > UNOFFICIAL means it did not come from ClamAVآ®. > > > > > > You need to take