I'm not worried about dependency on external libraries per se. I just
want to know *why*? With libz and libz2, it's pretty obvious, with
SSL, it's not clear.
Decrypting encrypted data while scanning would need the key. Is the
idea to crack open encrypted malware which comes with its own key?
That
http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/2014/02/22/introducing-openssl-as-a-dependency-to-clamav/
I just noticed this. I do the clamav packages for Debian/Ubuntu. Adding the
dependency is fine from a technical perspective, but there is, at least
currently, a licensing concern. The OpenSSL license is no
http://blog.snort.org/2014/03/open-source-community-webinar.html
Open Source Community Webinar
Open Source community,
First off, we’d like to thank everyone for their continued use of our projects
and products here at Sourcefire, now a part of Cisco. We love making great
software, and we lo
Am 03.03.2014 08:38, schrieb Paul Kosinski:
> There are only a few of reasons I can imagine that SSL (OpenSSL)
> would be a *required* addition to ClamAV:
Hello,
I thinks that's the keyquestion. *Which* problem should SSL solve.
Focus the problem, not one possible solution ...
Btw.
my clamav bin
Thomas Cameron wrote:
> I am taking advantage of the free tier at Amazon (640M memory) to host
> my e-mail server.
>
> Naturally, my first move was to install SpamAssassin and ClamAV for
> mail filtering, but I got out of memory errors when starting Clam.
>
> Is anyone running Clam in a very low