On 9/15/11 5:19 AM, "Tomasz Kojm" wrote:
> And that's the reason freshclam was choosing it as the first mirror all
> the time. Freshclam tries to balance the load by preferring mirrors with
> the lowest number of downloads. Then, when it fails to connect to such a
> mirror, it should disable this
At 10:42 PM -0700 9/14/2011, Al Varnell wrote:
Against all odds I've had three updates in the last 24 and two of them have
been from old .125
Not so lucky; here every freshclam run that has touched .125 includes
a failure still. My latest:
ClamAV update process started at Thu Sep 15 12:16:5
At 10:43 AM +0200 9/15/2011, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
OK, now please post the output of 'freshclam --list-mirrors'
Mirror #9
IP: 88.198.67.125
Successes: 13
Failures: 0
Last access: Fri Aug 26 10:45:31 2011
Ignore: No
-
Mirror #10
IP: 65.19.179.67
Successes: 24
Fai
On 9/14/2011 3:29 AM, sys...@ra-schaal.de wrote:
>
> i´ll have at look. but i´m moving until september to a new server with
> much bandwith (20 TB/month) and a better performance.
>
> maybe i can setup the mirror on this system on weekend.
>
> if you can´t connect to 88.198.67.125, you should fall
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 02:11:16 -0700 Al Varnell wrote:
[...]
> -
> Mirror #11
> IP: 88.198.67.125
> Successes: 10
> Failures: 0
> Last access: Wed Sep 14 15:46:40 2011
> Ignore: No
> -
> Mirror #12
> IP: 207.57.106.31
> Success
On 9/15/11 1:43 AM, "Tomasz Kojm" wrote:
> OK, now please post the output of 'freshclam --list-mirrors'
>
Janets-iMac-G5:~ jvarnell$ sudo /usr/local/clamXav/bin/freshclam
--list-mirrors
Mirror #1
IP: 194.8.197.22
Successes: 12
Failures: 0
Last access: Tue Sep 13 15:45:14 2011
Ignore: No
-
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:41:29 -0700 Al Varnell wrote:
> Looks to be OK.
OK, now please post the output of 'freshclam --list-mirrors'
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
\..._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985
On 9/15/11 1:30 AM, "Tomasz Kojm" wrote:
> Hey Al,
>
> please run 'freshclam -v' and look for this line:
>
> "Using IPv6 aware code"
>
> If it's not there, then most likely freshclam is using the older
> networking code, which does not randomize IP addresses on its own but
> only relies on the
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:42:53 -0700 Al Varnell wrote:
> Against all odds I've had three updates in the last 24 and two of them have
> been from old .125, so I reserve the right to revisit the other part of the
> issue in a few days after I have some statistics on how often it gets used
> on the fi
