Re: [clamav-users] clamd abending

2011-04-04 Thread René Berber
On 4/4/2011 5:05 PM, David Alix wrote: > I don't think the results are much ( they are below). We are running > ClamAV installed from a package. WIll I need to recompile clamd myself > to use gdb? Or get a newer gdb. > Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. [snip] You didn't show th

Re: [clamav-users] clamd abending

2011-04-04 Thread David Alix
I don't think the results are much ( they are below). We are running ClamAV installed from a package. WIll I need to recompile clamd myself to use gdb? David Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later Th

Re: [clamav-users] clamd abending

2011-04-04 Thread Török Edwin
On 2011-04-04 19:58, David Alix wrote: > I don't know what you mean by "alighnment issue". alignment issue, for example: on Sparc memory reads of 4-byte in size must be 4-byte aligned. If it is not properly aligned you get SIGBUS. This issue doesn't exist on x86, at least not for regular instructi

Re: [clamav-users] clamd abending

2011-04-04 Thread David Alix
I don't know what you mean by "alighnment issue". dmesg output is going into my logs already, and I can see no indication of an event around the time the clamd daemon abends. It is now happening as often as every 2 minutes. I have a core file, but my adb(mdb) is rusty. David --On Monday,

Re: [clamav-users] clamd abending

2011-04-04 Thread Peter Bonivart
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:26 AM, David Alix wrote: > I'm running clamav 0.97/12943 on Solaris 9.  Twice today, clamd has abended. >  I can find no error message in the log files indicating the problem.  Is > anyone else seeing this, or have any suggestions on how to troubleshoot > this? You could

Re: [clamav-users] clamd abending

2011-04-04 Thread Török Edwin
On 2011-04-04 07:26, David Alix wrote: > I'm running clamav 0.97/12943 on Solaris 9. Twice today, clamd has > abended. I can find no error message in the log files indicating the > problem. Did you check dmesg? maybe it is an alignment issue. > Is anyone else seeing this, or have any suggestio