Running an ubuntu 10.10 maverick system with the latest clamav as below.
It fails to find the virus in the scanned file even with the options:
--detect-pua=yes
--heuristic-scan-precedence=yes
--detect-broken=yes
I uploaded the file to the website to report it and it was de
All, or at least almost all pages will already convert %%store%% to the
store id.
Marshall
On 12/31/2010 3:35 PM, Chris wrote:
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
___
Probably not. However, a contemplation...
It's like a plane. Planes can have 1 engine, or 2, or even more, but
usually not more than 4. Why not 8 engines? 100?
Plane engines have two failure modes:
1) they stop working. If that engine is all you got, you're in deep
doodoo. That's why an e
Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
On 2011 Jan 3, at 1:46 , TR Shaw wrote:
On Jan 2, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Bob Traktman wrote:
Is there any reason not to keep ClamAv and Sophos Anti-Virus -- both active?
None whatsoever. Defense in depth is a good thing.
Probably not. However, a contemplation...
It's lik
On 2011 Jan 3, at 1:46 , TR Shaw wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Bob Traktman wrote:
>> Is there any reason not to keep ClamAv and Sophos Anti-Virus -- both active?
>
> None whatsoever. Defense in depth is a good thing.
Probably not. However, a contemplation...
It's like a plane. Planes can
