On Apr 24, 2010, at 11:22 AM, lists wrote:
Of course I am, hence why I can laugh at myself before others ;)
Jim
If that were really true you would not feel the need to keep seeking
attention for your views, but please, carry on for last word your
posts
are really {yawn} gripping.
Hi, all--
On Apr 24, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Simon Hobson wrote:
> Forget it, it's been covered, and you'll never persuade this group of people
> that a) there was any alternative,
You have plenty of alternatives. You can switch to using other AV software
from Norton, McCafee, TrendMicro, Panda, Kas
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 10:57 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:13 AM, lists wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 07:17 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> >> lists wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:46 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> >>>
> Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> > You mean, depl
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:13 AM, lists wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 07:17 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
lists wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:46 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
Stephen Gran wrote:
You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting,
monitoring,
pushing updates, etc? When most of t
Stephen Gran wrote:
Sigh. I guess you didn't bother to read the part about "third party
servers not under the control of the clamav team". This means updating
the actual edge servers is not trivial. The 'parallel infrastructure'
wasn't referring to deploying new hardware, it was referring to
On 4/24/10 6:36 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Chris Knight said:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
So, it still runs the software it used to run ? Yes
It's running software that is EO
Stephen Gran wrote:
> 1) Release a new version that pulls updates from a new hostname.
You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting, monitoring,
pushing updates, etc? When most of the mirrors are on third party
servers not under the control of the clamav team? Do you really think
t
Robert Wyatt wrote:
You missed a few steps :
- Find out what has happened to your software that was working fine
yesterday.
- Work out what to do RIGHT NOW because your phone is ringing with
people asking where their mail is*
- Put in place a quick workaround (disable scanning) to allow the mail
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 08:56:10AM -0700, Chris Knight said:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Chris Knight said:
> >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson w
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Chris Knight said:
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
>> >
>> >> So, it still runs the software it used to run ? Yes
>>
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 07:17 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> lists wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:46 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> >
> >> Stephen Gran wrote:
> >>
> >>> You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting, monitoring,
> >>> pushing updates, etc? When most of the mirrors ar
lists wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:46 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
Stephen Gran wrote:
You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting, monitoring,
pushing updates, etc? When most of the mirrors are on third party
servers not under the control of the clamav team? Do you really
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 06:46 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting, monitoring,
> > pushing updates, etc? When most of the mirrors are on third party
> > servers not under the control of the clamav team? Do you really think
> > t
Simon Hobson wrote:
Daniel McDonald wrote:
> I'm a little confused by this (still), is it not true that simply
turning off freshclam will allow clamav to continue working indefinitely
on the existing signature set?
No, you need to turn off freshclam *and* delete one signature, or grab an
old
Stephen Gran wrote:
You mean, deploy a parallel infrastructure of vhosting, monitoring,
pushing updates, etc? When most of the mirrors are on third party
servers not under the control of the clamav team? Do you really think
that's trivial, or were you just making up a solution without knowing
a
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Chris Knight said:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
> >
> >> So, it still runs the software it used to run ? Yes
> >> It's running software that is EOL ? Most definitely
> >>
On 04/24/2010 01:44 PM, Eduardo wrote:
>
> All 11 tests passed
> (1 test was not run)
>
>
> The problem
> when I run clamd or freshclam result this errors
>
> freshclam: relocation error: freshclam: symbol cli_versig2, ve
All 11 tests passed
(1 test was not run)
The problem
when I run clamd or freshclam result this errors
freshclam: relocation error: freshclam: symbol cli_versig2, version
CLAMAV_PRIVATE not defined in file libclamav.so.6 with link time
reference
clamd
Li
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
On 04/24/2010 11:08 AM, jef moskot wrote:
I doubled the MX_MAX_RSS and MX_MAX_AS arguments in the startup script,
and it seems to have taken care of the problem (which I was able to
recreate, see below).
What are these values btw?
Here's the relevant se
Chris Knight wrote:
>> 1) Release a new version that pulls updates from a new hostname.
2) Wait a couple of weeks, or even six months
3) Shut down old servers,
4. Orphan *all* previous versions, including the still heavily used, and
valid, 0.95s which were released before the hostnam
Daniel McDonald wrote:
> I'm a little confused by this (still), is it not true that simply
turning off freshclam will allow clamav to continue working indefinitely
on the existing signature set?
No, you need to turn off freshclam *and* delete one signature, or grab an
older copy of the sig
On 04/24/2010 11:08 AM, jef moskot wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
>> Does Mimedefang run clamscan under ulimit? (or is mimedefang itself
>> constrained by some ulimits?)
>
> I doubled the MX_MAX_RSS and MX_MAX_AS arguments in the startup script,
> and it seems to have taken care
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
Does Mimedefang run clamscan under ulimit? (or is mimedefang itself
constrained by some ulimits?)
I doubled the MX_MAX_RSS and MX_MAX_AS arguments in the startup script,
and it seems to have taken care of the problem (which I was able to
recreate, see b
On 04/24/2010 08:15 AM, jef moskot wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
>> On 04/22/2010 01:02 PM, jef moskot wrote:
>>> LibClamAV Error: CRITICAL: fmap() failed
>>> LibClamAV Warning: fmap: map allocation failed
>>> LibClamAV Error: CRITICAL: fmap() failed
>>> LibClamAV Warning: fmap:
24 matches
Mail list logo
