On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 19:32 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Robin wrote:
> > Jan Pieter: Thanks for balancing out the arguments!
> >
> > I have been trying to convince the upper end folks to accept clamav so
> > I was looking for some good use cases compared to McAfee CommandLine
> > Scanner, sin
Thomas Harold wrote:
On 12/3/2009 10:32 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
I quoted viruses above because much of what is found is actually
blacklisted URL's, scams, spam, etc. Very few true viruses show up
anymore.
That seems to be true if you're doing DNSBLs that block the dynamic
address range
On 12/3/2009 10:32 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
I quoted viruses above because much of what is found is actually
blacklisted URL's, scams, spam, etc. Very few true viruses show up anymore.
That seems to be true if you're doing DNSBLs that block the dynamic
address ranges. I see a steady trick
Robin wrote:
Jan Pieter: Thanks for balancing out the arguments!
I have been trying to convince the upper end folks to accept clamav so
I was looking for some good use cases compared to McAfee CommandLine
Scanner, since this would be the product I would use from the
corporate standard of McAfee
Jan Pieter: Thanks for balancing out the arguments!
I have been trying to convince the upper end folks to accept clamav so
I was looking for some good use cases compared to McAfee CommandLine
Scanner, since this would be the product I would use from the
corporate standard of McAfee.
Since I will
At 3:04 PM +0100 12/3/09, Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 04:17:50PM -0400, Robin wrote:
I am administering 7 Debian based LAMP servers and am working to get
anti-virus to scan uploads as they happen. Since I am a lone sheep in
the Microsoft wild of a larger organization I n
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 04:17:50PM -0400, Robin wrote:
> I am administering 7 Debian based LAMP servers and am working to get
> anti-virus to scan uploads as they happen. Since I am a lone sheep in
> the Microsoft wild of a larger organization I need to prove that Clam
> is up for the task and at
Thanks! I am "awaiting approval"
At 4:18 PM +0300 12/3/09, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
Tom,
I'm sorry, it's "IT Core Infrastructure" group, mentioned discusstion
topic is "Wanted to get a feel of what people are using for an
Enterprise Anti-virus solution in an environment with over 200
computers.
Tom,
I'm sorry, it's "IT Core Infrastructure" group, mentioned discusstion
topic is "Wanted to get a feel of what people are using for an
Enterprise Anti-virus solution in an environment with over 200
computers. We've used Symantec AV for 5 years now." opened by Robert
Tana.
Thanks.
On 03.12.2
At 3:50 PM +0300 12/3/09, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
Someone with linkedin account, could be interested in commenting the
following discussion
http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=10222162&gid=107486
Anatoly
Whats the group's name?
Tom
__
Someone with linkedin account, could be interested in commenting the
following discussion
http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=10222162&gid=107486
On 24.11.2009 / 15:27:44 -0500, Scott Mohnkern wrote:
> In our particular environment (a government server farm),
Your feedback was much appreciated and will definitely be using this
example to build my case.
Regard,
Robin
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Scott Mohnkern wrote:
> In our particular environment (a government server farm), we were asked to
> deploy the Mcafee virus scanning tools for Linux. Af
Hi there,
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 Syed Zubair wrote:
> I am not clear about this thread ...
> how does clamd get into it?
Did you read the subject line?
--
73,
Ged.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.cl
13 matches
Mail list logo
