Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Dennis Peterson
Richard Chapman wrote: I am interested in Tom's list of unofficial signatures - but haven't found the recommended way to use the signatures. Do I need to download them periodically - or do I just add an additional freshclam DataBaseMirror directive. In either case - exactly what is the url to

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 5:24 PM +0300 10/15/09, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_T3prA2NkQhJdMqo4E_3U4WfuiiDVVM" Content-Disposition: inline Does ClamAV somehow dedicate to email format (base64) or how it is possible that i

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
15.10.2009 17:24, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti: Does ClamAV somehow dedicate to email format (base64) or how it is possible that is does not recognise this http://www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/FILE_UPS_c380a16.zip That's an UPS fraud, W32/Bredolab.D.gen!Eldorado by F-Prot. Uh. The point was that

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Does ClamAV somehow dedicate to email format (base64) or how it is possible that is does not recognise this http://www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/FILE_UPS_c380a16.zip That's an UPS fraud, W32/Bredolab.D.gen!Eldorado by F-Prot. -- http://www.iki.fi/jarif/ An exotic journey in downtown Newark is in

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 1:23 PM +0100 10/15/09, Steve Basford wrote: > Undetected Outlook Express malware: h t t p :/ / www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/install.zip That's one of 'em: Sanesecurity.Rogue.736.UNOFFICIAL FYI Official ClamAV sigs now detect as Trojan.Inject-2443 I just noticed that my winnow.malware.75

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
15.10.2009 16:47, Tom Shaw kirjoitti: At 4:30 PM +0300 10/15/09, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_6GorA2txt0CVliaTmJuBPNhCIqDzZA" Content-Disposition: inline Undetected IRS scam variant. http://www.iki

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 4:30 PM +0300 10/15/09, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_6GorA2txt0CVliaTmJuBPNhCIqDzZA" Content-Disposition: inline Undetected IRS scam variant. http://www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/tax-statement.exe -

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 3:14 PM +0300 10/15/09, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_20nrA2UWvqBocwzbhDgZQrQ22plLxr" Content-Disposition: inline 15.10.2009 14:55, Tom Shaw kirjoitti: The samples I have of that one are being

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 1:23 PM +0100 10/15/09, Steve Basford wrote: > Undetected Outlook Express malware: h t t p :/ / www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/install.zip That's one of 'em: Sanesecurity.Rogue.736.UNOFFICIAL Well that one didn't get detected by standard ClamAV. Must be running multiple payloads That one

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Undetected IRS scam variant. http://www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/tax-statement.exe -- http://www.iki.fi/jarif/ A classic is something that everyone wants to have read and nobody wants to read. -- Mark Twain, "The Disappearance of Literature" pgptHhkej7lOn.pgp Description: PGP sig

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Steve Basford
> Undetected Outlook Express malware: > h t t p :/ / www.iki.fi/jarif/malware/install.zip That's one of 'em: Sanesecurity.Rogue.736.UNOFFICIAL Cheers, Steve Sanesecurity ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net ht

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Steve Basford
> Steve, > > The samples I have of that one are being detected by ClamAV standard > sigs as Trojan.Peed-477. Wonder why you and some others didn't detect > it with standard sigs? Could this be a problem? Do you have samples > that were undetectable? Not sure Tom... here's a quick test... Offici

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Jari Fredriksson
15.10.2009 14:55, Tom Shaw kirjoitti: The samples I have of that one are being detected by ClamAV standard sigs as Trojan.Peed-477. Wonder why you and some others didn't detect it with standard sigs? Could this be a problem? Do you have samples that were undetectable? Tom Undetected Outlo

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Shaw
At 10:18 AM +0100 10/15/09, Steve Basford wrote: > I am interested in Tom's list of unofficial signatures - but haven't found the recommended way to use the signatures. Do I need to download them periodically - or do I just add an additional freshclam DataBaseMirror directive. In either case

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Steve Basford
> I am interested in Tom's list of unofficial signatures - but haven't > found the recommended way to use the signatures. Do I need to download > them periodically - or do I just add an additional freshclam > DataBaseMirror directive. In either case - exactly what is the url to > download from - or

Re: [Clamav-users] Some Virus not detected by Clamav

2009-10-15 Thread Richard Chapman
I am interested in Tom's list of unofficial signatures - but haven't found the recommended way to use the signatures. Do I need to download them periodically - or do I just add an additional freshclam DataBaseMirror directive. In either case - exactly what is the url to download from - or to ad