> From: ja...@iki.fi
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:37:54 +0300
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] nonblock_connect: connect timing out (30 secs)
>
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> But do I really need clamd??
> >>> As far as I can tell, clamd "only" gives me on-acce
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> But do I really need clamd??
>>> As far as I can tell, clamd "only" gives me on-access
>>> protection, right?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Agostinho
>>>
>>
>> No, clamd does not give to transparent backgroup
>> protection, like the Windows antivirus tools to. It is a
>> daemoni
> From: ja...@iki.fi
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:50:56 +0300
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] nonblock_connect: connect timing out (30 secs)
>
> >> From: ja...@iki.fi
> >> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> >> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:55:31 +0300
> >> Sub
>> From: ja...@iki.fi
>> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:55:31 +0300
>> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] nonblock_connect: connect
>> timing out (30 secs)
>>
The second symptom is from not running clamd, or having
a wrong path to clamav's config file in freshcl
> From: ja...@iki.fi
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:55:31 +0300
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] nonblock_connect: connect timing out (30 secs)
>
> >> The second symptom is from not running clamd, or having
> >> a wrong path to clamav's config file in freshclam.conf.
Just a heads up on this piece of malware as you may have read about
this in Computerworld or another news source.
winnow sigs distributed as part of sanesecurity have been detecting
the scam email as well as their changing payloads housed on fast flux
domains for almost 2 weeks
See:
http://w
