>> At 2:00 PM -0700 9/14/09, Bill Landry wrote:
>>> > At 12:59 PM -0700 9/14/09, Bill Landry wrote:
>Tom Shaw wrote:
>> I am running ClamAV 0.95.2/9806/Mon Sep 14 14:37:58 2009 when I
>> run
>> clamscan on a file I get no detection yet when I submit the same
>> file
>>
> At 2:00 PM -0700 9/14/09, Bill Landry wrote:
>> > At 12:59 PM -0700 9/14/09, Bill Landry wrote:
Tom Shaw wrote:
> I am running ClamAV 0.95.2/9806/Mon Sep 14 14:37:58 2009 when I run
> clamscan on a file I get no detection yet when I submit the same
> file
> to
> vi
At 2:00 PM -0700 9/14/09, Bill Landry wrote:
> At 12:59 PM -0700 9/14/09, Bill Landry wrote:
Tom Shaw wrote:
I am running ClamAV 0.95.2/9806/Mon Sep 14 14:37:58 2009 when I run
clamscan on a file I get no detection yet when I submit the same file
to
virustotal (0.94.1/20090912) I get Tr
> At 12:59 PM -0700 9/14/09, Bill Landry wrote:
>>Tom Shaw wrote:
>>> I am running ClamAV 0.95.2/9806/Mon Sep 14 14:37:58 2009 when I run
>>> clamscan on a file I get no detection yet when I submit the same file
>>> to
>>> virustotal (0.94.1/20090912) I get Trojan.Zbot-4583 detected.
>>>
>>> My
At 12:59 PM -0700 9/14/09, Bill Landry wrote:
Tom Shaw wrote:
I am running ClamAV 0.95.2/9806/Mon Sep 14 14:37:58 2009 when I run
clamscan on a file I get no detection yet when I submit the same file to
virustotal (0.94.1/20090912) I get Trojan.Zbot-4583 detected.
My clamav install has been
Tom Shaw wrote:
> I am running ClamAV 0.95.2/9806/Mon Sep 14 14:37:58 2009 when I run
> clamscan on a file I get no detection yet when I submit the same file to
> virustotal (0.94.1/20090912) I get Trojan.Zbot-4583 detected.
>
> My clamav install has been operating fine for months on OSX 10.5.
>
I am running ClamAV 0.95.2/9806/Mon Sep 14 14:37:58 2009 when I run
clamscan on a file I get no detection yet when I submit the same file
to virustotal (0.94.1/20090912) I get Trojan.Zbot-4583 detected.
My clamav install has been operating fine for months on OSX 10.5.
Ideas?
Tom
_
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 17:27 +0200, Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
> I'm running clamd with both official and sanesecurity sigs.
>
> Now I made a test with my virus archive and recognized that clamd prefers the
> sanesecurity sigs. Using only ClamAV original sigs I have ~3500 virus matches.
> Using both or
Hi,
I occasionally submit virus samples to ClamAV through the official
submission page.
Before submission I also check these viruses with VirusTotal, where at least
a bunch of AV products do often detect my samples as malware.
If this happens, I also add a link to the VirusTotal's analysis page
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:27:23 +0200
Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm running clamd with both official and sanesecurity sigs.
>
> Now I made a test with my virus archive and recognized that clamd prefers
> the sanesecurity sigs. Using only ClamAV original sigs I have ~3500 virus
> matches. Us
Hi!
I'm running clamd with both official and sanesecurity sigs.
Now I made a test with my virus archive and recognized that clamd prefers the
sanesecurity sigs. Using only ClamAV original sigs I have ~3500 virus matches.
Using both original and sanesecurity sigs ~3900 are found, but the originals
Hello Steve, thanks for the reply. I have read the docs but these are now
sorely missed points. Assuming it is too late to issue the prescribed command
set what is the next course of action to restore clamd? Please advise, David.
Steve Holdoway wrote ..
> On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 13:06 -0500, da.
12 matches
Mail list logo
