[Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.5)

2009-05-25 Thread Bill Landry
Hi Folks, This should be the last update of this script for awhile, unless issues are reported. I've started a new job and the project schedule is going to be quite intense for the next 6 months to a year. Anyway, people have been asking for a script that can create ClamAV hexadecimal signature

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 07:19 -0500, M. Lewis wrote: > Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote: > >> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora > >> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with > > > > I'm

Re: [Clamav-users] will virus mail direct drop to mailbox when milter dead?

2009-05-25 Thread Giorgio Bellussi
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 25.05.09 00:56, martinnitram wrote: >> We found that at clamav 0.95.1, the virus mail will direct drop to user >> mailbox when milter sock dead. At previous (0.94.2 - ), milter dead will >> cause a send mail standard error (5.x.x or something like server not >>

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread M. Lewis
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote: >> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora >> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with > > I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4. > >> this, but I'm wondering

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread M. Lewis
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote: >> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora >> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with > > I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4. > >> this, but I'm wondering

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread M. Lewis
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:54 +0200, aCaB wrote: > [] >> you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will > > FC4 has gcc-4.0.2. So FC3 should have a gcc-3. > Just do `rpm -q gcc` or `yum install gcc` and see what it has/delivers. > > Be

Re: [Clamav-users] will virus mail direct drop to mailbox when milter dead?

2009-05-25 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 25.05.09 00:56, martinnitram wrote: > We found that at clamav 0.95.1, the virus mail will direct drop to user > mailbox when milter sock dead. At previous (0.94.2 - ), milter dead will > cause a send mail standard error (5.x.x or something like server not > available to sender) and then the ma

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote: > I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora > Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4. > this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up t

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:54 +0200, aCaB wrote: [] > you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will FC4 has gcc-4.0.2. So FC3 should have a gcc-3. Just do `rpm -q gcc` or `yum install gcc` and see what it has/delivers. Bernd -- Firmix Software GmbH

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread Anatoly Pugachev
On 25.05.2009 / 07:01:05 -0500, M. Lewis wrote: > aCaB wrote: > > M. Lewis wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will > > get any sort of compilation errors. Working them around is not trivial BTW. > > > > If you can somehow get a gcc 3.x i

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-05-25 15:01, M. Lewis wrote: > aCaB wrote: > >> M. Lewis wrote: >> >>> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora >>> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with >>> this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread M. Lewis
aCaB wrote: > M. Lewis wrote: >> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora >> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with >> this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on >> this system. >> >> Previously all upgrades

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread aCaB
M. Lewis wrote: > I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora > Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with > this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on > this system. > > Previously all upgrades were done via RPM,

[Clamav-users] Upgrade very old Clamav

2009-05-25 Thread M. Lewis
I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on this system. Previously all upgrades were done via RPM, which of course has not bee

[Clamav-users] will virus mail direct drop to mailbox when milter dead?

2009-05-25 Thread martinnitram
Dear all, We found that at clamav 0.95.1, the virus mail will direct drop to user mailbox when milter sock dead. At previous (0.94.2 - ), milter dead will cause a send mail standard error (5.x.x or something like server not available to sender) and then the mail rejected. At /etc/clamav-milt