Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-04-08 22:40, Bill Landry wrote:
>> Török Edwin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Edwin,
>>
>>
>>> For 0.95.1 I was thinking about something like this (not yet implemented):
>>> S:X:F5B73C1339C8C9B2B9537F129D63F4ECA16E0346819FB417E643CDA7B9EFA09A
>>>
>> I am now running:
>>
>> cla
On 2009-04-08 22:40, Bill Landry wrote:
> Török Edwin wrote:
>
> Hi Edwin,
>
>
>> For 0.95.1 I was thinking about something like this (not yet implemented):
>> S:X:F5B73C1339C8C9B2B9537F129D63F4ECA16E0346819FB417E643CDA7B9EFA09A
>>
>
> I am now running:
>
> clamscan --version
> ClamAV 0.95.
Török Edwin wrote:
Hi Edwin,
> For 0.95.1 I was thinking about something like this (not yet implemented):
> S:X:F5B73C1339C8C9B2B9537F129D63F4ECA16E0346819FB417E643CDA7B9EFA09A
I am now running:
clamscan --version
ClamAV 0.95.1/9214/Wed Apr 8 09:46:42 2009
However, I tried this syntax in a fi
Here's an updated on for 0.95.1
diff -cr clamav-0.95/clamd/clamd.c clamav-0.95-patched/clamd/clamd.c
*** clamav-0.95/clamd/clamd.c 2009-03-16 14:37:26.0 -0400
--- clamav-0.95-patched/clamd/clamd.c 2009-04-08 10:37:34.0 -0400
***
*** 217,226
char timestr
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
> Hi there --
>
> I wrote a script that does an update to the virus database, and then runs a
> recursive check of all directories, with certain exceptions, on the
> system in question. Enclosed with this e-mail is the script in two versions.
> The
> first version exclud
Hi there --
I wrote a script that does an update to the virus database, and then runs a
recursive check of all directories, with certain exceptions, on the
system in question. Enclosed with this e-mail is the script in two versions. The
first version excludes several directories, while the other
I have a patch for using clamav-95 with multi log if anyone is intrested.
I didn't write the orginal patch I found it on shupp.org but they stopped
adding release at 0.91.
patched clean and no issues with compile or running on Fedora 9/8/7/5/3
Patch paste below:
diff -cr clamav-0.95/clamd/clamd
