Wanneer ik via KlamAV probeer een update uit te voeren krijg ik de
volgende melding:
Update Process died unexpectedly! Did you kill it manually?
Wat gaat er fout
Dank bij voorbaat
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clama
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:26:57PM +0100, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>
> But if I launch configure with --disable-gcc-vcheck, configure doesn't
> execute this check, all configure continues. So, it seems that configure
> considers this as a gcc bug and not a generic bug which can be found
On 2009-03-06 16:26, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
> Henrik K wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:04:04PM +0100, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>>
>>> **
>>> checking for gcc bug PR26763-2... ok, bug not present
>>>
>>
>>> checking for valid c
Henrik K wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:04:04PM +0100, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>> **
>> checking for gcc bug PR26763-2... ok, bug not present
>
>
>> checking for valid code generation of CLI_ISCONTAINED... configure:
>> error: your compiler has a bug that
On 2009-03-06 16:04, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
> Török Edwin wrote:
>
>
>> What gcc version did you use? Did you set -mcpu flag?
>>
>
> SunStudio 12
>
> 160 - clamav/clamav-0.95rc1 > cc -V
> cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_sparc 2007/05/03
>
> with standard flags.
>
> I don't have gcc installe
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:04:04PM +0100, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>
> **
> checking for gcc bug PR26763-2... ok, bug not present
> checking for valid code generation of CLI_ISCONTAINED... configure:
> error: your compiler has a bug that causes clamav bug no. 6
Török Edwin wrote:
>
> What gcc version did you use? Did you set -mcpu flag?
SunStudio 12
160 - clamav/clamav-0.95rc1 > cc -V
cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_sparc 2007/05/03
with standard flags.
I don't have gcc installed at this computer. Well, it's there but I
don't use it.
>
> Looks like the Linux
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-03-04 22:54, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>> Time: 14.949 sec (0 m 14 s)
>>
>> A T2000 with 8 cores looks like this :
>>
>> # psrinfo -v
>> Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 03/04/2009 21:44:58
>> on-line since 01/30/2009 12
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 06:09 -0600, Chris wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 22:45 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > >
> > >> Does freshclam.log exist and if so, who owns it and what are the
> > >> permissions?
> > >
> > > lo
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 22:45 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> >
> >> Does freshclam.log exist and if so, who owns it and what are the
> >> permissions?
> >
> > locate freshclam.log in a terminal? Don't know about Mac but there
At 9:04 AM + 3/6/09, Steve Basford wrote:
> > No, it just has all sorts of characters in the virus name, like ][.
>
>Chris/All...
>
>If you want to manually fix, try replaing "][Date:" with "-"
>
>see if that passes the 0.95RC1 tests
Actually its just the : that's causing the problem. Repl
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:16:18PM +0100, shuttlebox wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
> wrote:
> >> On a Solaris10/sparc box (UltraSPARC-IIi 440Mhz) it takes 18s.
> >
> > Hmmm, a T2000 is "slightly" better than your sparc box (a 10 years old
> > Ultra 5 or Ultra
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:32:05 -0600
Chris wrote:
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1041 2009-03-05
>17:42 /usr/local/bin/clamav-config*
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 195923 2009-03-05
>17:42 /usr/local/bin/clamconf*
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 clamav clamav 228068 2009-03-05
>17:42 /usr/local/bin/clamdscan*
>-rwxr-xr
On 2009-03-05 01:32, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> RedHat Linux, AMD Athlon 2Mhz, signatures are uncompressed and include all
> Sane
> Security signatures and MSRBL signatures. The following is unscientific and
> anecdotal, but repeatable:
>
> [...]
>
> Time: 2.242 sec (0 m 2 s)
>
> [...]
>
> Solaris
> No, it just has all sorts of characters in the virus name, like ][.
Chris/All...
If you want to manually fix, try replaing "][Date:" with "-"
see if that passes the 0.95RC1 tests
Cheers,
Steve
Sanesecurity
___
Help us build a comprehensive Clam
15 matches
Mail list logo
