Hi Torok Edwin and friends,
Thank you for your reply, it's very useful. I would like to confirm some
small concerned things
Wrong, ClamAV doesn't use rsync at all!
>
> ClamAV downloads the database via HTTP (optionally through a proxy).
>
>
ClamAV does not use rsync for updating database between c
On 2008-11-26 21:22, tung dang wrote:
> Hi friends,
>
Hi,
> Currently, i am investigating about update mechanism of ClamAV. I don't find
> any document, that describes clearly this mechanism, so i would like to be
> confirmed and be explained more detail.
> Firstly,i would like to present this
Hi friends,
Currently, i am investigating about update mechanism of ClamAV. I don't find
any document, that describes clearly this mechanism, so i would like to be
confirmed and be explained more detail.
Firstly,i would like to present this mechanism. I'm not sure about all
informations in this ema
His definition mirrors just haven't caught up with the main mirror yet, it
happens. Just wait a day or so.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Rick Macdougall wrote:
> > Dennis Peterson wrote:
> >> Jason Bertoch wrote:
> >>> I understand this is harmless,
Brandon Perry wrote:
> His definition mirrors just haven't caught up with the main mirror yet, it
> happens. Just wait a day or so.
>
It is even more confused - this is what is in my log:
Local version: 0.94.1 Recommended version: 0.94.2
And this is what is on the clamav home page:
Latest Clam
On Nov 26, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended version: 0.94.1
is my math wrong or is the error message recommending the previous
version ?
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
On 2008-11-26 17:47, Brandon Perry wrote:
> His definition mirrors just haven't caught up with the main mirror yet, it
> happens. Just wait a day or so.
The TTL on current.cvd.clamav.net needs to expire, if you're using a DNS
cache.
Should not take more than ~15 minutes.
Best regards,
--Edwin
___
Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Jason Bertoch wrote:
>>> I understand this is harmless, but shouldn't there be some logic in
>>> freshclam to avoid this error?
>>>
>>> freshclam[29375]: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
>>> freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Jason Bertoch wrote:
>> I understand this is harmless, but shouldn't there be some logic in
>> freshclam to avoid this error?
>>
>> freshclam[29375]: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
>> freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended version: 0.94.1
>
> It's not
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> I understand this is harmless, but shouldn't there be some logic in
> freshclam to avoid this error?
>
> freshclam[29375]: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
> freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended version: 0.94.1
It's not an error, it is an advisory to le
I understand this is harmless, but shouldn't there be some logic in
freshclam to avoid this error?
freshclam[29375]: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
freshclam[29375]: Local version: 0.94.2 Recommended version: 0.94.1
Jason A. Bertoch
Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electronet Bro
On 2008-11-25 23:58, Ken S. wrote:
> I'm having a little trouble with ClamAV-0.94.1 running on a Redhat-ES5 server.
>
> I set up a cron script to execute a scan of my web htdocs directory.
> It runs for 5-6 hours and then quits. Here is a snippet of the output
> that is sent back to me in cron:
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
