Dear All,
I am upgrading Clamav-0.886 to Clamav-0.91.2 on Solaris 9 x86, when I try to
'make', it gives me fallowing error could someone help me.
Thanks,
Imran
ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [libclam
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/23stze
>
> Email is not a requirement - it's being outsourced.
There's probably going to be another opening posted within days. It's a
great location to work in.
http://tinyurl.com/29zu3w
dp
___
Help us bui
micah wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:59:04 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> micah wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You will note that i've tried -HUP, -USR1 and -USR2.
>>>
>>> I still do appreciate your replies,
>>> micah
>> I got out the source code for a quick read and didn't see anywhere in
>> there where s
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:59:04 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> micah wrote:
>
>
>> You will note that i've tried -HUP, -USR1 and -USR2.
>>
>> I still do appreciate your replies,
>> micah
>
> I got out the source code for a quick read and didn't see anywhere in
> there where signals would force r
-- Trog said the following on 9/19/07 2:55 PM:
> Forth alternative: use current SVN code, which has it's own regex code to
> overcome platform issues.
Compiled smoothly for me on Solaris 10 x86. It's now running on test
box. Thanks for the tip. We'll see how it goes.
Amos
_
micah wrote:
>
> You will note that i've tried -HUP, -USR1 and -USR2.
>
> I still do appreciate your replies,
> micah
I got out the source code for a quick read and didn't see anywhere in
there where signals would force reloading the config file. Given that it
can result in inconsistent resul
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:08:47 -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
> micah wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:06:11 -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
>>
>>> Bill Landry wrote:
micah wrote:
> Are there any signals I can send to clamd to tell it to reload its
> config files? I've tried -HUP, -USR1 and -USR2
