Re: [Clamav-users] 0.91 - high load under solaris

2007-08-30 Thread Bill Landry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following on 8/30/2007 8:13 PM -0800: > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following on 8/30/07 3:40 PM: > >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >>> I'm noticing hang issues again with 0.91.2 on Solaris 10 x86. It doesn't >>> appear to be associated w

Re: [Clamav-users] Sourcefire acquires ClamAV

2007-08-30 Thread Dennis Peterson
Paul Kosinski wrote: > There is another aspect to the acquisition of ClamAV that seems not > to have been discussed. What happens to the people who made monetary > donations to the ClamAV project? (I am not in this group, as I never > quite got around to it.) I'm one of those who donated cash and

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.91 - high load under solaris

2007-08-30 Thread clamav-users
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following on 8/30/07 3:40 PM: > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I'm noticing hang issues again with 0.91.2 on Solaris 10 x86. It doesn't >> appear to be associated with a particularly malformed message because >> when it starts hanging, if I restart

Re: [Clamav-users] Donors (was Re: Sourcefire acquires ClamAV)

2007-08-30 Thread David F. Skoll
Beppe Di Maio wrote: > Reasonably large translates into...? I believe it was $1000, but I'd have to check to be sure. -- David. ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Donors (was Re: Sourcefire acquires ClamAV)

2007-08-30 Thread Beppe Di Maio
Reasonably large translates into...? On 8/30/07, David F. Skoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Kosinski wrote: > > > There is another aspect to the acquisition of ClamAV that seems not > > to have been discussed. What happens to the people who made monetary > > donations to the ClamAV project?

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.91 - high load under solaris

2007-08-30 Thread clamav-users
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm noticing hang issues again with 0.91.2 on Solaris 10 x86. It doesn't appear to be associated with a particularly malformed message because when it starts hanging, if I restart it, things resume normally for a while. The incoming queue clears out.

[Clamav-users] Donors (was Re: Sourcefire acquires ClamAV)

2007-08-30 Thread David F. Skoll
Paul Kosinski wrote: > There is another aspect to the acquisition of ClamAV that seems not > to have been discussed. What happens to the people who made monetary > donations to the ClamAV project? (I am not in this group, as I never > quite got around to it.) My company (Roaring Penguin Software

[Clamav-users] Sourcefire acquires ClamAV

2007-08-30 Thread Paul Kosinski
There is another aspect to the acquisition of ClamAV that seems not to have been discussed. What happens to the people who made monetary donations to the ClamAV project? (I am not in this group, as I never quite got around to it.) I would imagine that many people who donated to ClamAV did so in th

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.91 - high load under solaris

2007-08-30 Thread clamav-users
-- Török Edvin said the following on 8/12/07 3:26 PM: > > It would be mroe useful if you could get a backtrace of all running threads. > Use a debugger (like gdb) to do that. > In case of gdb, just attach to the running process, and do a 'thread > apply all bt'. > I'm noticing hang issues again

Re: [Clamav-users] Script update

2007-08-30 Thread Bill Landry
Arnaud Jacques wrote: > Hello Bill, > >>> ftp.inetmsg.com/pub/unoffical-sigs.sh Corrected file name: ftp.inetmsg.com/pub/unofficial-sigs.sh > Great job ! It's working fine ! Thanks! >>> supports downloads from 4 different signature providers (SaneSecurity, >>> MSRBL, SecurityInfo, and Mal

Re: [Clamav-users] Maintain its own clamAv DB

2007-08-30 Thread Urban Loesch
Thanks Urban Arnaud Jacques wrote: > Hello, > >> I would like to maintain my own virus and phishing database. >> Do you know how can I do that? Is there some HOW-TO or something >> else? > > http://www.clamav.net/doc/latest/signatures.pdf > ___ Help

Re: [Clamav-users] Subject: False Positive about Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SSL-Spoof

2007-08-30 Thread Jean-Marc Pigeon
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 15:42 +0200, Doug Andrews wrote: > Hi Jean-Marc, > I am seeing the same problem - did you manage to resolve this? > I'd appreciate any advice you can give. > Thanks, The only way for us to resolve the problem was to remove the CL_DB_PHISHING_URLS from

Re: [Clamav-users] Maintain its own clamAv DB

2007-08-30 Thread Arnaud Jacques
Hello, > I would like to maintain my own virus and phishing database. > Do you know how can I do that? Is there some HOW-TO or something > else? http://www.clamav.net/doc/latest/signatures.pdf -- Cordialement / Best regards, Arnaud Jacques Consultant Sécurité SecuriteInfo.com http://www.securi

[Clamav-users] Maintain its own clamAv DB

2007-08-30 Thread Urban Loesch
Hi, I'm new to this list. I would like to maintain my own virus and phishing database. Do you know how can I do that? Is there some HOW-TO or something else? I'm using Version 91.2. Thanks and regards Urban Loesch ___ Help us build a comprehensive Cla

Re: [Clamav-users] Temporary quarantine file creation failed

2007-08-30 Thread Nigel Horne
Clam user wrote: Hello, during high loads, this occurs (lack of newline as in the original message) : -- Temporary quarantine file /clamav/quarantine/msg.{00810 creation failed/clamav/quarantine/msg.{00810: File exists -- Using ClamAV 0.90.2 on HP-UX 11.11 Has anyone had this problem, if yes

[Clamav-users] Temporary quarantine file creation failed

2007-08-30 Thread Clam user
Hello, during high loads, this occurs (lack of newline as in the original message) : -- Temporary quarantine file /clamav/quarantine/msg.{00810 creation failed/clamav/quarantine/msg.{00810: File exists -- Using ClamAV 0.90.2 on HP-UX 11.11 Has anyone had this problem, if yes - how did you solve

Re: [Clamav-users] Script update

2007-08-30 Thread Arnaud Jacques
Hello Bill, > > ftp.inetmsg.com/pub/unoffical-sigs.sh Great job ! It's working fine ! > > supports downloads from 4 different signature providers (SaneSecurity, > > MSRBL, SecurityInfo, and Malware Block List). Btw, it is SecuriteInfo.com not SecurityInfo : frenchies here ;) -- Cordialeme